The Intellectual Fraud of Robin DiAngelo’s “White Fragility”

David Burke
7 min readJun 13, 2020
Photo by Tim Pierce, Wikimedia Commons https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Silence_is_violence_(15394765154).jpg

After it was published in 2018, Robin DiAngelo’s White Fragility received fawning reviews from The New Yorker and Publishers Weekly on its way to becoming a New York Times bestseller. Well-intentioned white people bought the book in droves and the titular phrase became ubiquitous, used as a way to explain or attack white people who protested when accused of racism. Now, as more Americans are asking how they can fight racism in response to the appalling deaths of George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, and Breonna Taylor, White Fragility has seen a resurgence, this time topping the bestseller list.

But while people’s desire for valuable insight about race-related issues is laudable, White Fragility cannot satisfy that need. The book does not offer profound insight into the souls of white people. Rather, White Fragility is religion masquerading as knowledge. DiAngelo’s conception of white fragility isn’t hard won wisdom. It’s an unprovable and unfalsifiable theory, deceptively framed to convince readers of their own guilt.

You’re Either A Fragile Racist, or A Fragile Racist

Throughout White Fragility DiAngelo tries to convince readers of two things. First, DiAngelo argues that white people are inescapably racist, writing, “All white people are invested in and collude with racism,” and that “The white…

--

--

David Burke

aka “The Logical Liberal.” Activist and attorney trying to improve our political system — www.thelogicalliberal.com. Founder of www.citizenstakeaction.org.