The SEC just got beaten by an ICO in Court

Blockvest took on the mighty SEC and won. This precedent will embolden more ICO’s to fight.

Last week it seemed that the SEC was going to destroy the ICO as we know it. They successfully attacked Paragon and Airfox and not only forced each to pay a $250K fine, but also to fully refund investors. Everyone expected that most ICO’s would undergo a similar treatment.

Emboldened by their easy wins against Paragon and Airfox, the SEC started attacking the whole ICO community, expecting similar results. The future seemed rather.

But not everyone was ready to just accept defeat without a fight. Blockvest defended itself in court and won.

A federal court in California ruled against the SEC. This ruling is a massive win not just for Blockvest, but for most ICO’s.

A Summary of the Court's Decision

1. For there to be a security, the court requires that the investor must “commit his assets to the enterprise” so as to risk “financial loss”. These requirements are independently important.

“So, just buying the coins on a secondary market — even if they’re prefunctional — might not by itself result in a securities offering. Potentially powerful stuff.” — Marco Santorini

2. According to the court, in the ICO context there must be a “risk of financial loss”.

“This supports the proposition that something like an airdrop, by itself, cannot be a securities offering, even if the airdropped tokens are pre-functional. If the tokens are given away for free it is very hard to prove financial risk.” — Marco Santori

3. The SEC tried to claim that a mere “offer” is enough to violate the securities laws. The Court went out of its way to specifically reject that argument.

“The court found that the SEC must first prove that the thing being offered is independently a security. Just offering a token isn’t enough.” — Marco Santori

4. The SEC must prove that the investor was actually offered the security.

“This means the plaintiff must prove something called “reliance” — reliance on economic inducement, promotional materials etc. Here there was a tough factual dispute over just what the investors saw before they clicked “buy”, and the court wouldn’t cut the plaintiff any slack.” — Marco Santorini

If you want to read the full decision of the court click the file below.

Conclusion

This precedent will make it a lot harder for the SEC to get simple wins. It will also embolden ICO’s to defend themselves against the SEC, instead of simply accepting whatever the SEC demands.

If you enjoyed this story, please click the 👏 button (keep it pressed until you reach 50) and share to help others find it!

Read next

The 1000 DAPPS Manifesto

The First Decentralised Accelerator for #BUIDL’ers, powered by Blockchain, Vitalik Buterin’s DAICO Model, Security Tokens, and the Blockchain Community.

More on 1000DAPPS.com

The Road to Mass Adoption is paved with DApps

To get Blockchain & Crypto to the masses, we need blockchain apps to be used by the masses.

Join 1000dapps.com.