Having Children Helps — Not Hurts — Our Future

Mollie Ziegler Hemingway

Journalist Tina Brown opened the 2016 Women in the World Summit in New York City by lamenting the state of women in the United States. To make her case that the situation for women was perilous, she cited a curious data point: Birthrates for poor women in Texas had increased in recent years.

Brown is hardly alone in making this dubious connection between female welfare and birthrates. In January, 113 female attorneys signed a brief to the Supreme Court asserting that their economic opportunities had expanded thanks to having had abortions earlier in their careers and education.[1]

Men and women in the United States are routinely told that children are a threat to their economic opportunity. Is that true? And what are the implications for the country as a whole if they come to believe that?

We may find out. For the past 10 years, America’s fertility rate has been in decline. The fertility rate refers to the average number of children that the average woman has over her lifetime. It first dipped below the “replacement rate” of 2.1 in the early 1970s and has largely remained there since. The replacement rate is the rate needed to maintain the population of a country without immigration. A declining rate poses risks to the economy, the military, entitlement programs, the growth of mediating institutions such as houses of worship, and community health.

As Professors Walter R. Schumm and Jason S. Carroll have shown, falling fertility rates increase the “dependency ratio,” or the number of citizens receiving entitlements relative to the number of workers.[2] This is likely to mean increased government spending on health care and increased taxes on those remaining in the workforce.

Declining fertility rates lead to worker shortages, and that can result in increased investment in pension funds and a resulting decrease in productive investments, leading to lower rates of economic growth. Further, decreased fertility reduces the number of extended family members that make up the warp and woof of family support systems.

“Previous generations feared a population explosion,” reports The Wall Street Journal. “But for today’s global economy, the problem is just the opposite. Falling fertility rates and aging workforces will plague the developed world.”[3]

Economic hardship is one cause of the falling fertility rate. One recent massive study concluded that living through a recession means that some women will never have children, even after economic prospects rise. Janet Currie and Hannes Schwandt, health economists at Princeton University, report that more than 150,000 women who were in their early 20s in 2008 will forgo having any children in their lifetimes as a result of that economic disruption.[4]

Additionally, Millennials, more than any previous American generation, are delaying marriage. In fact, they are delaying most of the steps associated with adulthood, from moving out of their childhood home to getting a full-time job and having children.[5] Millennials are less likely to report wanting to get married and face economic barriers to achieving that goal. Millennial women who seek marriage say that having a spouse with a steady job is of great importance, but labor force participation rates and wages have fallen for younger men in recent decades, making it harder for men to appear marriageable.

It is not surprising, then, that Millennial women are having fewer children. In fact, they are having children at the slowest pace of any generation in U.S. history, declining more than 15 percent in five years, according to one study by the Urban Institute.[6]

That is a shame, because economic mobility across generations is tied more to healthy families than to any policy or economic program. Men and women who marry and raise children together have better economic, psychological, and health outcomes than their peers who do not do so. In the study For Richer, for Poorer: How Family Structures Economic Success in America, for example, family life scholars W. Bradford Wilcox and Robert I. Lerman report that men and women enjoy substantially higher family incomes, compared to their peers, when they marry.[7]

Declining fertility is not good for American economic opportunity. It also comes at a more personal cost to many women. Around 40 percent of U.S. women approaching the end of their fertility report having had fewer children than they wished, according to the General Social Survey.[8] The ramifications of declining fertility are so broad and deep that individuals at all levels of society may soon come to wish that we had more children.

Mollie Ziegler Hemingway is a Senior Editor at The Federalist.

Next Up in the Culture Section:

Single-Parent Households

Endnotes

  1. Brief of Amici Curiae by Janice MacAvoy, Janie Schulman, et al., Whole Woman’s Health v. Cole (Sup. Ct.) (No. 15–274),
    http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Janice-Macavoy-Paul-Weiss.pdf (accessed May 12, 2016).

© 2016 by The Heritage Foundation. All Rights Reserved.

2016 Index of Culture and Opportunity

The Social and Economic Trends that Shape America

Medium is an open platform where 170 million readers come to find insightful and dynamic thinking. Here, expert and undiscovered voices alike dive into the heart of any topic and bring new ideas to the surface. Learn more

Follow the writers, publications, and topics that matter to you, and you’ll see them on your homepage and in your inbox. Explore

If you have a story to tell, knowledge to share, or a perspective to offer — welcome home. It’s easy and free to post your thinking on any topic. Write on Medium

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store