This story is unavailable.

The title is technically correct but is misleading because they figured out the real reasons, location and ownership. At most this article proves being republican doesn’t mean not buying solar, if republicans were bigger on solar because they were republicans then this would be very good news and would be replicated state and nationwide and members of congress/house would either not be elected or have to sport renewable energy to get elected

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.