The most sustained fraud, deception, manipulation, and propaganda war in the history of science is in full swing as this article is written — a systematic, long-running fraud to make Big Tobacco look like big babies.

This is the microwave mafia: the military /industrial / academic /political / media Gestapo that has ensured that the entire global landscape is covered with telecoms masts and blanketed with pulsed microwave radiation. And which produces a vast amount of propaganda, including serial outright fake studies, to convince everyone that there’s absolutely no health risk.

When I say fake studies, here are just a few examples off the top of my head.

• The infamous Danish cohort study, involving over 400,000 mobile phone subscribers, and which found no association with brain cancer. These innovative researchers found a way to take the very most radiated people in the entire population — businessmen (generally) in the early days who had company phone contracts — and count them as completely unexposed. They did this by focusing only on people with personal phone accounts. Phone calls were very expensive in the early days, and it’s a fact that the heaviest users were business people (generally men) with company phones. Clever trick to count them as “unexposed”, which the researchers noted was a problem with their study — but not enough of a problem to stop them taking money from Danish telecoms to produce it. Dr George Carlo, hired by the US cellphone industry to coordinate research on health, has written in a scientific journal how these same Danish researchers came to him earlier, offering blatantly to conduct a study guaranteed to produce industry-friendly findings, if he would fund them. To his credit, he sent them packing; but says that the study they eventually produced is exactly what they proposed to him. A world expert on this epidemiology, Dr Michael Kundi of the Medical University of Vienna, corrected the Danes’ study and found that it actually showed a clear increase in brain cancer with mobile use. You will NEVER see this reported in any mainstream news media; but the Danish cohort study to this day is punted as a gold standard in research by certified idiots. You can find my rebuttal of one such idiot publishing on Medium.com here.
• Take a look at the above rebuttal and you’ll also see an analysis of studies by Dr James Rubin of King’s College, London, that repeat exactly the same trick. Rubin used cellphones with dummy antennas as his “non-radiating” handsets. There is no question that the near field radiation intensity (where your head is) will be much stronger in this case, than with a radiating antenna, which puts the radiation into the environment. So in Rubin’s case, the “unexposed” people were given the very highest doses of radiation; and then, when they report headaches, are basically called nut-cases (“idiopathic”) by Rubin, who is a psychologist. Rubin, explicitly hired by the UK government to do research to allay public health fears, is the person the UK government sends to international conferences to tell everyone that it’s all fine, it’s just “idiopathic” idiots who say they get headaches from their phones. He also conducted maybe the most biased and twisted media study in history, to prove that it’s not microwave radiation that causes headaches: it’s journalists, writing stories about it.
• Also hired by the UK government to quell public health fears is a Dr Paul Elliott of Imperial College, London. He produced literally the only study in the world on health and cancer around masts that did NOT find a problem. All the other 23 studies of masts show a consistent pattern of health problems, including raised cancer rates. I have reverse-engineered his study to show just how Elliott rigged it. Again, he manages to take the very most exposed people, and count them as completely unexposed. The way he does this is clever. While his results show a distinct protective effect of masts against brain cancer — can you work out why this should be? — he needs to explain away a 16% increase in childhood leukaemias at intermediate distances from masts, where the beam tends to be strongest. (There’s a 3% increase in leukaemias close to the masts, again showing a protective effect of being close, where handset radiation is low). Research in Sweden showed that the very most radiated people in the entire country were rural Swedes who lived far from masts, but used their mobile phones a lot. At a distance from a mast, the phone powers up to a maximum; and working with an electrical engineer, Prof Olle Johansson of Karolinska Institute showed that these rural people were actually getting the highest doses of radiation of all; and were showing significantly increased Alzheimer’s rates. Now, Elliott completely ignores handset radiation; but if the subjects were using handsets, and we can be fairly sure many of them were (of course, Elliott never asked them or even mentions this factor anywhere in his study) then the ones far from masts would be getting the highest radiation. Elliott makes a cutoff of 700m, ignoring all masts further away. This means he eliminates the cases where all the masts are over 700m away: he is saying these people are basically completely non-radiated. Yet these are the very people whose phones must be powering to a maximum, because the nearest mast must be almost a kilometre away at the least. Subtle; clever; and Elliott refuses to answer questions as to why he ignored handset radiation, refuses to respond to any queries at all, and thus refuses to provide his dataset so that I can prove that his study actually shows very clear patterns of increased cancer around masts. I am certain there will be a cluster of cancers in cases where all the masts are over a kilometre away, because these “unexposed” people’s handsets will be powering up nine ways south of Sunday. Elliott has completely hidden these people away.
• A recent, truly egregious study from Australia purported to show that brain cancer had not gone up with mobile use. This was produced by one Simon Chapman, of whom the less said the better; but his figures actually show a drastic increase in brain tumours in older men, exactly the cohort that he actually identifies in this same paper (those businessmen with commercial contracts) as the heaviest early users. The increase in brain cancer in older males he reports is actually higher than any of the predictions by the Interphone study and similar investigations, which find a 40% increase in brain cancer with 27 minutes’ use a day over 10 years. However, he simply ignores his own evidence as to why these older men are suffering such high brain cancer rates. The only thing he can say is that this increase started before cellphones were introduced, although it carries on climbing steeply thereafter. Because the trend started a few years before cellphones came out, it just can’t be phones, in his book. What he is totally ignoring — and absolutely no major study ignores this — is that microwave cordless phones came out several years before mobiles did. I actually found details of microwave cordless phones being manufactured in Australia a few years before the time the brain cancer rates start climbing. Chapman refuses to address this issue completely, it just doesn’t exist for him. So again: even when you see the brain cancer graph climbing, you find a way to deny and to lie and to obfuscate. Now, all the WHO functionaries and flunkies fell over themselves to praise Chapman’s study and punt it as proof that mobiles are safe. You will look hard to find a more blatantly rigged and biased study than Chapman’s. I am a statistical editor, and if that paper had crossed my desk, I would just have sent it straight back, saying “Sucking numbers out of your thumb is not a valid statistical technique.” If you look at the bullet points for this study, the very first “fact” you are invited to take away from it is that 90% of Australians use mobiles. This is in fact a total thumb-suck, based only (as far as I can see — Chapman also refused to answer my queries) on the fact that there are more SIM cards than people in Australia. No indication of subscriber churn; no indication of commercial users and double phones; no indication of criminal use of multiple phones (Australia, being the only nation founded specifically with criminal immigrants, might be expected to have unusual crime patterns); not even a mention of two-timing Australians who might want a second phone to keep in touch with the mistress. Just a thumb-suck. This figure then becomes 92% on a graph, and Chapman won’t answer questions as to where this 2% suddenly came from, either.
• Two top American researchers, Chou and Foster, produced a really clear case of industry PR, when they did a review of studies showing that children’s heads absorb more radiation from handsets, a point often made in the few media reports that warn of the dangers. They managed to twist the results exactly upside-down, in a blatant piece of manipulation and deception, to say that these studies found the exact opposite of what they actually reported. We put out a press release specifically calling these researchers frauds. That charge stands. C-K Chou is the former head of the Motorola lab, which managed to get this technology rolled out without any proper health testing. Read the late Motorola engineer Robert C Kane’s book Cellular Telephone Russian Roulette — the greatest “insider” account ever written — to see exactly how they rigged it. Kane died of a brain tumour after a career testing mobile phone antennas for Motorola; his tumour appeared exactly where he held the antennas to his head. He also published one of the first papers linking autism to microwave radiation; a truly brilliant man. RIP. His book was self-published, and I’ve vowed to edit it properly one day and see it given the prominence it deserves, as a crucial historical account of a planned corporate genocide.
• Another really seriously fraudulent study appeared in the Royal Society Interface. This investigated the effects of bar magnets on a few obscure proteins, and the Manchester University PR department then put out a release from these scientists, saying that they had shown that mobile phones were safe. This was picked up by an idiot journalist called Sarah Knapton (Fleet Street’s Queen of Copy and Paste, or Copypasta, according to the newspaper’s online trolls), reporting that “The magnetic fields created by mobile phones and power lines are not harmful to human health, the University of Manchester has found.” Now: no one has ever, to my knowledge, implicated static magnetic fields in any health problems. They carry no health risk rating whatsoever. However, fluctuating magnetic fields — as emitted by a mobile phone whose battery current changes, as you talk, as you walk — are classed as a 2B possible human carcinogen. So what these Manchester researchers do is take a couple of bar magnets, and show that nothing happens to some obscure rat proteins when they’re in a static magnetic field. How this is turned into a study of mobile phones and human health, you must speak to the Telegraph to find an answer. I took this to IPSO, the British press’s self-regulator. After six months of wrangling, IPSO would only say: the newspaper quoted the press release correctly. The fact that a press release is not a peer-reviewed study was the one issue I asked IPSO to clarify; it was the one issue they managed to obfuscate completely, describing the researchers’ statements in their PR release as their scientific “conclusions”. The lead researcher, one Alex Jones (no relation, I suspect) is an enthusiastic member of an organisation called Sense About Science, centrally linked with the Royal Society, and which has whole webpages putting out industry propaganda that mobile phones (and especially GMOs) are quite safe. Again, we see here the Royal Society as an absolutely central player in a long-running scientific fraud. If any enterprising journalist were to pick away at that particular festering scab, they would be amazed at what stinking rot lies beneath that august British establishment facade. Oh, perfidious Albion is still very busy with its imperial lies and deceptions.

These are just a few examples off the top of my head. I can give you far more. The point is: there are at least 20,000 scientific papers, since the 1920s, showing that low-level microwaves are dangerous and have biological effects. There is an industry mantra, however, that says: The Only Effects Microwaves Have On Living Organisms Is Simple Heating. There is no other possible or even conceivable mechanism whereby “non-ionising radiation” can possibly affect us, look, it’s in the name. The fact that there are 20,000 studies saying otherwise, is literally just completely ignored by WHO and their associated mafia friends. There is no mechanism to explain these results; therefore, we do not have to pay attention to them. That, in all literality, is the “scientific” attitude of the establishment. Studied ignore-ance.

You, at MIT, with your military and industrial connections, are at the very heart of the whole fraud, of course. In the early 1970s, a Defence Intelligence Agency report in the US noted the dangers of microwaves, noted the fact that the Soviet Union had far more stringent radiation protection for its citizens than the US, and then decided to sweep the whole issue under the carpet, because imposing more stringent radiation guidelines would affect “military posture and industrial output”.

Estimates are that this radiation will kill or incapacitate a rock-bottom minimum of 3% of the population. I get this direct from the UK government’s former top scientist in microwave warfare, Mr Barrie Trower, who visited South Africa and Botswana in 2010. Preparing battlefield estimates like this for the UK government was his job. Mr Trower does not say one single word that he cannot back up with copious scientific evidence. He says that that DIA document will be responsible for killing far more people than WW1 and WW2 combined. At 5 billion global users, we are indeed talking a minimum of 150 million people killed or their health destroyed. We are seeing it all around us. Your kids have all lost their minds. Your autism rate in kids alone is over 2% in the USA. You are suffering from epidemics of Alzheimer’s, ADD, sleep disorders, “rages”, teen suicides and depression, lingering influenza, leukaemia, even hair loss: all of these have been clinically reported in relation to microwaves. South Africa’s main health insurer has noted a particular epidemic of testicular cancer in that country. But it is all swept under the carpet. And no journalist will look at it, because they are all too wedded to their phones. And their salaries.

And what will MIT do about this? Oh, boy. I do love the resounding silence that ensues, whenever I query one of the main propaganda arms of the military / industrial / academic axis of evil. I have a motto for all of you, incidentally, drawn from a Len Deighton novel, where the head of British intelligence puts up a sign in his office saying: “Only Ignorance Is Invincible.”