Whistleblower-defence.com

Whistleblower-defence.com(WBD) is a blog intended to inform the public of events, news, and legislation related to whistleblowers. The blog is ran by Proskauer Rose LLP, a credible law firm founded in New York in 1875. The website is aesthetically pleasing, current, and credible. A credible Website has unbiased and accurate reporting of events and is transparent with the authors of the site. [WDD is a credible source ran by an international law firm. It circulates news related to whistleblowing legislation with no bias.]

WBD’s affiliation with Proskauer boosts its credibility. Proskauer is an international law firm founded over one hundred years ago with thirteen offices worldwide. They employ over seven hundred attorneys and have thousands of clients. Proskauer represents almost every major sport organizations, such as the NBA, NHL, and, NFL; as well as many top celebrities. High profile clients pay large sums of money in order to have the best on their side. These facts together build a strong case for the credibility of Proskauer. This reputation extends itself to any publications affiliated with it because of its vested interest to not publish false information.

Format

A significant portion of the articles published by WBD follow a similar format. A brief introduction, followed by a summary of the ruling, and concluded with a paragraph discussing the ramifications of the ruling. A recent article on WBD summarizes the Final Ruling of OSHA regulations on Whistleblowing. The article is written by Steven J pearlman, a partner of the firm, and Emilie Adams, an associate. After listing the key features of the ruling the authors summarize the ramifications of the ruling.

“The foregoing are substantially similar to the rules applicable to claims under Section 806 of SOX. The arguably relaxed standard and other features arguably are likely to encourage complainants’ counsel to pursue claims through the DOL’s adjudicative system. “

This summary goes over what the rulings will probably mean to future cases involving whistleblowers. The authors choose to not make a definite stance on the results of the ruling as only time will tell. They put forward a logical conclusion based on the court’s words. The ruling itself is quite extensive and technical which is seemingly why The writers of the article dissect it and summarize it with seven key features.

Information

The information on WBD is updated many times a month with all subjects relating to Whistleblowing news. The information that is covered on the website is written about in a factual tone. There are no appeals to pathos; however, there are appeals to logos and ethos. The information that is posted always has various hyperlinks to first hand reports of the event. Most of the news relates to legislation and lawsuits; these articles always have links to the official court rulings on government websites. The credibility of government websites can not be argued without looking like a deranged lunatic, so we will assume the government websites are very credible. The website gives a summary of news, and an interpretation of the ramifications of the decision. There is no misleading information anywhere on the site.

Purpose

WBD exists to inform the public of recent legislation affecting whistleblowers. The page prominently displays the most recent stories at the top, chronologically going down. The people contributing to the website are all affiliated with Proskauer, with every contributor’s name listed on the main page. Each name links to a small biography of the writer. This amount of transparency and ease of access to the author’s’ information adds to the website’s credibility. Delving deeper into the website shows that Proskauer-Rose LLP are the proprietors of the website. By clicking on the logo anywhere on WDD, one is taken to the landing page of Proskauer. The affiliation between Proskauer and WDD does not seem to add any bias to the published information as the nature of being a successful law firm involves being unbiased and private in your dealings.

The landing page off WBD is polished and professional. It is organized in a way the coerces one’s eye to primarily focus on the newly updated material, featured prominently in the center of the landing page. The editors at Proskauer chose to use a white background with minimal coloring. This color scheme gives the page a very calming and neutral effect. As little controversy as possible. With no flare and no buzz, this websites is made purely inform.

WBD exists to inform the public of legislation related to whistleblowing. They don’t pick sides on the information presented but rather simply put all the information out and let the reader determine how to feel about it. Information presented on the site is up to date and factual. The contributors and owners of the website are easily found and are all professional. These facts put together give WBD a very strong case for credibility.