Weekly Journal 7

2/25/16

11:10–12:30

In today’s class we talked about the differences between Alcibiades and Socrates. Despite Alcibiades being an alleged lover of Socrates he seemed to not have picked up any of his “partner’s” tendencies nor his ethics. Although it is said that their relationship didn’t really surpass that than of a teacher, student relationship I think the exorbitant amount of differences is great evidence for this argument as in most romantic relationships the partners tend to pick up each others habits. The things that Socrates and Alcibiades did share in common were their ideologies and personality traits. For example both men were anti-democratic and grandiose. Given that these things can be and are most likely to be transferred from one person to another in a teacher student relationship it really makes grounds for the solidity of that argument. This finding of mines isn’t too much of what our class discussion entailed but is just a little something I was able to pull from it all.

2/26/16

5:00–6:00 P.M. Reading of Xenophon’s Apology of Socrates.

The major differences I see between the accounts of Socrates case done by Xenophon and Plato are the ways Socrates is being portrayed. In Xenophon’s I feel that he wrote of it to make it seem like Socrates didn’t care about the case at all and lost it on purpose. While in Plato’s I feel that he wrote of it that it seemed like Socrates was pouring his heart out on trial and was giving it his all to win the case. Another difference in the way Socrates was portrayed is that in Xenophon’s he wrote about Socrates in a way that made Socrates look like a dick who deserved to be found guilty, while Plato gave Socrates a more pleasant air making him out to be a man wrongfully accused who deserved everyone’s amnesty for any wrong he may have done. Perhaps these differences are merely differences in perception or personal bias either writer had for Socrates. Whatever the reason(s) for the differences are/is it sure is something worth researching and debunking.

2/27/16

1:00–2:00 P.M. Difference Between Intellectual/Spiritual & Political Leader

In my eyes the only difference between intellectual/spiritual and political leaders are the absence of morals and ethics that come with being a political leader. For example lets say you think the killing of animals for clothing is ethically absurd, as an intellectual/spiritual leader you full on get to have that opinion and can let it be known your support for that yet if you were a political leader who believed the same thing and it was an option to close down 80 factories in your country that produced clothing goods with animal skins yet 400,000 people would lose their job in the process you’d not necessarily have to but for yours and others best interest would keep the factories open despite your disapproval for their practices. As far as their goals and character there isn’t any set differences between intellectual/ spiritual and political leaders. However as far as to who is more likely to have more self-centered goals and bad character I would have to say it’s the political leader. The only conflicts faced by these leaders are the same for intellectual/spiritual as well as political leaders. Those conflicts are temptation (bribery etc.) and meeting the desires of their followers.

2/28/16

11:00–1:00 P.M. Job Position for Cannon Missioner to Historic Black Churches.

Some challenges this leader might face are putting one congregation over another and having to make other tough decisions that may get them negatively criticized. I honestly don’t think I’ve ever held a leadership position this complex. I wouldn’t be a good candidate for this position not now nor in the future because I’m not attracted to the position and religion really complicates leadership. Not only would I probably perform horribly as a leader in an undesired position such as this but I would perform halfheartedly and in my opinion making halfhearted decisions is worse than making wrong decisions. Also religion really does make leading harder to do as it applies so many specifics to the position and makes everything so much more personal. All in all this job offer could come with a high salary, tax exemptions, and a Beamer, Benz, or Bentley with a Brazilian super model in the passenger seat and I (might take it just off strength of the super model and tax exemptions.) would still find it undesirable.

2/29/16

6:00–7:00 P.M. Reading of Marcus Aurelius’ Meditations and Wiki Biography

  • Paraphrases all italicized

From my grandfather Verus I learned good morals and the government of my temper.

He learned what is and how to do right from his grandfather along with how to control his anger.

From the reputation and remembrance of my father, modesty and a manly character.

He learned how to be a man and be humble from his father.

From my mother, piety and beneficence, and abstinence, not only from evil deeds, but even from evil thoughts; and further, simplicity in my way of living, far removed from the habits of the rich.

He learned to live a clean cut life from his mother.

From my great-grandfather, not to have frequented public schools, and to have had good teachers at home, and to know that on such things a man should spend liberally.

He learned to not waste too much time learning and to learn from those at home from his great-grandfather.

From my governor, to be neither of the green nor of the blue party at the games in the Circus, nor a partizan either of the Parmularius or the Scutarius at the gladiators’ fights; from him too I learned endurance of labour, and to want little, and to work with my own hands, and not to meddle with other people’s affairs, and not to be ready to listen to slander.

He learned to be a brainwashed slave from his governor. But really though.

From Diognetus, not to busy myself about trifling things, and not to give credit to what was said by miracle-workers and jugglers about incantations and the driving away of daemons and such things; and not to breed quails for fighting, nor to give myself up passionately to such things; and to endure freedom of speech; and to have become intimate with philosophy; and to have been a hearer, first of Bacchius, then of Tandasis and Marcianus; and to have written dialogues in my youth; and to have desired a plank bed and skin, and whatever else of the kind belongs to the Grecian discipline.

He learned to put his mind on higher things from Diognetus.

From Rusticus I received the impression that my character required improvement and discipline; and from him I learned not to be led astray to sophistic emulation, nor to writing on speculative matters, nor to delivering little hortatory orations, nor to showing myself off as a man who practises much discipline, or does benevolent acts in order to make a display; and to abstain from rhetoric, and poetry, and fine writing; and not to walk about in the house in my outdoor dress, nor to do other things of the kind; and to write my letters with simplicity, like the letter which Rusticus wrote from Sinuessa to my mother; and with respect to those who have offended me by words, or done me wrong, to be easily disposed to be pacified and reconciled, as soon as they have shown a readiness to be reconciled; and to read carefully, and not to be satisfied with a superficial understanding of a book; nor hastily to give my assent to those who talk overmuch; and I am indebted to him for being acquainted with the discourses of Epictetus, which he communicated to me out of his own collection.

He learned to continually improve himself from Rusticus.

From Apollonius I learned freedom of will and undeviating steadiness of purpose; and to look to nothing else, not even for a moment, except to reason; and to be always the same, in sharp pains, on the occasion of the loss of a child, and in long illness; and to see clearly in a living example that the same man can be both most resolute and yielding, and not peevish in giving his instruction; and to have had before my eyes a man who clearly considered his experience and his skill in expounding philosophical principles as the smallest of his merits; and from him I learned how to receive from friends what are esteemed favours, without being either humbled by them or letting them pass unnoticed.

He learned to handle emotion from Apollonius.

From Sextus, a benevolent disposition, and the example of a family governed in a fatherly manner, and the idea of living conformably to nature; and gravity without affectation, and to look carefully after the interests of friends, and to tolerate ignorant persons, and those who form opinions without consideration: he had the power of readily accommodating himself to all, so that intercourse with him was more agreeable than any flattery; and at the same time he was most highly venerated by those who associated with him: and he had the faculty both of discovering and ordering, in an intelligent and methodical way, the principles necessary for life; and he never showed anger or any other passion, but was entirely free from passion, and also most affectionate; and he could express approbation without noisy display, and he possessed much knowledge without ostentation.

He learned to coexist with other people from Sextus.

From Alexander the grammarian, to refrain from fault-finding, and not in a reproachful way to chide those who uttered any barbarous or solecistic or strange-sounding expression; but dexterously to introduce the very expression which ought to have been used, and in the way of answer or giving confirmation, or joining in an inquiry about the thing itself, not about the word, or by some other fit suggestion.

He learned to slide into discussion from Alexander the grammarian.

From Fronto I learned to observe what envy, and duplicity, and hypocrisy are in a tyrant, and that generally those among us who are called Patricians are rather deficient in paternal affection.

He learned to observe bad behavior, from Fronto.

From Alexander the Platonic, not frequently nor without necessity to say to any one, or to write in a letter, that I have no leisure; nor continually to excuse the neglect of duties required by our relation to those with whom we live, by alleging urgent occupations.

He learned to not make excuses from Alexander the Platonic.

From Catulus, not to be indifferent when a friend finds fault, even if he should find fault without reason, but to try to restore him to his usual disposition; and to be ready to speak well of teachers, as it is reported of Domitius and Athenodotus; and to love my children truly.

He learned to be tolerable from Catulus.

From my brother Severus, to love my kin, and to love truth, and to love justice; and through him I learned to know Thrasea, Helvidius, Cato, Dion, Brutus; and from him I received the idea of a polity in which there is the same law for all, a polity administered with regard to equal rights and equal freedom of speech, and the idea of a kingly government which respects most of all the freedom of the governed; I learned from him also consistency and undeviating steadiness in my regard for philosophy; and a disposition to do good, and to give to others readily, and to cherish good hopes, and to believe that I am loved by my friends; and in him I observed no concealment of his opinions with respect to those whom he condemned, and that his friends had no need to conjecture what he wished or did not wish, but it was quite plain.

He learned to appreciate things from Severus.

From Maximus I learned self-government, and not to be led aside by anything; and cheerfulness in all circumstances, as well as in illness; and a just admixture in the moral character of sweetness and dignity, and to do what was set before me without complaining. I observed that everybody believed that he thought as he spoke, and that in all that he did he never had any bad intention; and he never showed amazement and surprise, and was never in a hurry, and never put off doing a thing, nor was perplexed nor dejected, nor did he ever laugh to disguise his vexation, nor, on the other hand, was he ever passionate or suspicious. He was accustomed to do acts of beneficence, and was ready to forgive, and was free from all falsehood; and he presented the appearance of a man who could not be diverted from right rather than of a man who had been improved. I observed, too, that no man could ever think that he was despised by Maximus, or ever venture to think himself a better man. He had also the art of being humorous in an agreeable way.

He learned discipline from Maximus.

In my father I observed mildness of temper, and unchangeable resolution in the things which he had determined after due deliberation; and no vainglory in those things which men call honours; and a love of labour and perseverance; and a readiness to listen to those who had anything to propose for the common weal; and undeviating firmness in giving to every man according to his deserts; and a knowledge derived from experience of the occasions for vigorous action and for remission. And I observed that he had overcome all passion for boys; and he considered himself no more than any other citizen; and he released his friends from all obligation to sup with him or to attend him of necessity when he went abroad, and those who had failed to accompany him, by reason of any urgent circumstances, always found him the same. I observed too his habit of careful inquiry in all matters of deliberation, and his persistency, and that he never stopped his investigation through being satisfied with appearances which first present themselves; and that his disposition was to keep his friends, and not to be soon tired of them, nor yet to be extravagant in his affection; and to be satisfied on all occasions, and cheerful; and to foresee things a long way off, and to provide for the smallest without display; and to check immediately popular applause and all flattery; and to be ever watchful over the things which were necessary for the administration of the empire, and to be a good manager of the expenditure, and patiently to endure the blame which he got for such conduct; and he was neither superstitious with respect to the gods, nor did he court men by gifts or by trying to please them, or by flattering the populace; but he showed sobriety in all things and firmness, and never any mean thoughts or action, nor love of novelty. And the things which conduce in any way to the commodity of life, and of which fortune gives an abundant supply, he used without arrogance and without excusing himself; so that when he had them, he enjoyed them without affectation, and when he had them not, he did not want them. No one could ever say of him that he was either a sophist or a home-bred flippant slave or a pedant; but every one acknowledged him to be a man ripe, perfect, above flattery, able to manage his own and other men’s affairs. Besides this, he honoured those who were true philosophers, and he did not reproach those who pretended to be philosophers, nor yet was he easily led by them. He was also easy in conversation, and he made himself agreeable without any offensive affectation. He took a reasonable care of his body’s health, not as one who was greatly attached to life, nor out of regard to personal appearance, nor yet in a careless way, but so that, through his own attention, he very seldom stood in need of the physician’s art or of medicine or external applications. He was most ready to give way without envy to those who possessed any particular faculty, such as that of eloquence or knowledge of the law or of morals, or of anything else; and he gave them his help, that each might enjoy reputation according to his deserts; and he always acted conformably to the institutions of his country, without showing any affectation of doing so. Further, he was not fond of change nor unsteady, but he loved to stay in the same places, and to employ himself about the same things; and after his paroxysms of headache he came immediately fresh and vigorous to his usual occupations. His secrets were not but very few and very rare, and these only about public matters; and he showed prudence and economy in the exhibition of the public spectacles and the construction of public buildings, his donations to the people, and in such things, for he was a man who looked to what ought to be done, not to the reputation which is got by a man’s acts. He did not take the bath at unseasonable hours; he was not fond of building houses, nor curious about what he ate, nor about the texture and colour of his clothes, nor about the beauty of his slaves. His dress came from Lorium, his villa on the coast, and from Lanuvium generally. We know how he behaved to the toll-collector at Tusculum who asked his pardon; and such was all his behaviour. There was in him nothing harsh, nor implacable, nor violent, nor, as one may say, anything carried to the sweating point; but he examined all things severally, as if he had abundance of time, and without confusion, in an orderly way, vigorously and consistently. And that might be applied to him which is recorded of Socrates, that he was able both to abstain from, and to enjoy, those things which many are too weak to abstain from, and cannot enjoy without excess. But to be strong enough both to bear the one and to be sober in the other is the mark of a man who has a perfect and invincible soul, such as he showed in the illness of Maximus.

Reiterations of things he learned.

To the gods I am indebted for having good grandfathers, good parents, a good sister, good teachers, good associates, good kinsmen and friends, nearly everything good. Further, I owe it to the gods that I was not hurried into any offence against any of them, though I had a disposition which, if opportunity had offered, might have led me to do something of this kind; but, through their favour, there never was such a concurrence of circumstances as put me to the trial. Further, I am thankful to the gods that I was not longer brought up with my grandfather’s concubine, and that I preserved the flower of my youth, and that I did not make proof of my virility before the proper season, but even deferred the time; that I was subjected to a ruler and a father who was able to take away all pride from me, and to bring me to the knowledge that it is possible for a man to live in a palace without wanting either guards or embroidered dresses, or torches and statues, and such-like show; but that it is in such a man’s power to bring himself very near to the fashion of a private person, without being for this reason either meaner in thought, or more remiss in action, with respect to the things which must be done for the public interest in a manner that befits a ruler. I thank the gods for giving me such a brother, who was able by his moral character to rouse me to vigilance over myself, and who, at the same time, pleased me by his respect and affection; that my children have not been stupid nor deformed in body; that I did not make more proficiency in rhetoric, poetry, and the other studies, in which I should perhaps have been completely engaged, if I had seen that I was making progress in them; that I made haste to place those who brought me up in the station of honour, which they seemed to desire, without putting them off with hope of my doing it some time after, because they were then still young; that I knew Apollonius, Rusticus, Maximus; that I received clear and frequent impressions about living according to nature, and what kind of a life that is, so that, so far as depended on the gods, and their gifts, and help, and inspirations, nothing hindered me from forthwith living according to nature, though I still fall short of it through my own fault, and through not observing the admonitions of the gods, and, I may almost say, their direct instructions; that my body has held out so long in such a kind of life; that I never touched either Benedicta or Theodotus, and that, after having fallen into amatory passions, I was cured; and, though I was often out of humour with Rusticus, I never did anything of which I had occasion to repent; that, though it was my mother’s fate to die young, she spent the last years of her life with me; that, whenever I wished to help any man in his need, or on any other occasion, I was never told that I had not the means of doing it; and that to myself the same necessity never happened, to receive anything from another; that I have such a wife, so obedient, and so affectionate, and so simple; that I had abundance of good masters for my children; and that remedies have been shown to me by dreams, both others, and against bloodspitting and giddiness…; and that, when I had an inclination to philosophy, I did not fall into the hands of any sophist, and that I did not waste my time on writers of histories, or in the resolution of syllogisms, or occupy myself about the investigation of appearances in the heavens; for all these things require the help of the gods and fortune.

Reiterations of things he learned.

3/1/16

11:10–12:30

In today’s class we went spent the majority of our class time going over Xenophon’s Apology of Socrates. First I’m glad that it was clarified that Xenophon wasn’t actually at the hearing because there are a few major inconsistencies in the way Socrates was portrayed between the two text. The whole class pretty much agreed that Plato and Xenophon’s version of Socrates case are very much different. As for the differences one that surprised me that the class pretty much all agreed to was that Xenophon’s Socrates was a lot less pleasant than Plato’s.

3/2/16

11–1:00 A.M. Studying

All I did today was study for Thursday’s quiz.

A single golf clap? Or a long standing ovation?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.