The MRA apologists and anti-feminists are sure in force in the comments section. Ready and willing to defend a man’s right to joke about fucking his “conquests” till they eschew bloody chunks or refer to other women as steak and furniture because this clichéd piece is so damn offensive to men.

Good grief, guys who take issue with this because it did not state in plain type, “not all men,” need to honestly grow-up. How do they not expect us to laugh at them when they unabashedly treat this comical piece as an animadversion or some feminist effrontery to their “manhood”? Do these critics not understand what context or nuance means, or does their persecution-complex impair their judgment?

Do they not understand that this misogyny crap in our culture is real and a problem?

As for the feminist phantom demonizing men as rapacious monsters, I have seen plenty of men, who were not feminists, who referred to themselves that way. I have seen a man defend a ridiculous bathroom law in North Carolina because the temptation for him would be too great for him to enter a woman’s restroom. So, this is indeed a problem with men within our culture, not some feminist red-herring.

It is sometimes fun to see what nonsense these types currently believe in like “disposable utility,” “gynocentrism,” “hypergamy,” “red pill/blue pill/black pill,” “Myth of Male Power,” and on and on. It seems seeing men as the new victim class is the fun, edgy new entertainment every rubbish internet-dweller must get their hands on. After a while, it gets rather boring watching them play-acting the angry, outraged, “how can this be so,” enervated chevaliers (so-called “nice guys,” sympathetic “Bettys,” and Jughead types).

Please note I used popular MRA and “internet” MGTOW terminology for reference for those who do not know, especially the terms “nice guys,” “Bettys,” and Jughead, you know, Archie, and do not forget about the “Chads,” and the Alpha and Beta-male nonsense.