Akula765
Akula765
Aug 8, 2017 · 1 min read

“ Congratulations. Gawker made his memo less annoying. You actually think his citations are helpful. No, they’re more intellectually dishonest. Just adding a number next to something *doesn’t* mean its cited. It just means he has a footnote. Yeah, some of those things are citations, but a lot are just him making more assumptions. There are so many un-cited ‘facts’ that this memo is cringeworthy. His logical arguments are poorly formed. He clearly has no understanding of correlation & causation. From a purely logical standpoint, if you subtract out the actual content, this is very poorly written. It honestly makes me wonder how he stayed at Google as long as he did.”

That’s a whole lot of words to type without ever once actually directly addressing anything he said, or anything his sources said. This just a verbose way of shouting “NUH UH!”, and every bit as devoid of merit as an argument.

    Akula765

    Written by

    Akula765