Decomposing a Monolith into Spring Microservices

Image Source

Introduction

In today’s rapidly evolving technology landscape, many organizations find themselves grappling with large monolithic applications that are difficult to maintain and scale. These monoliths, although reliable and time-tested, often become a bottleneck in the software delivery process. Decomposing them into microservices offers a way out, but the transition can be challenging. In this article, we’ll explore how to break a monolithic application into smaller, more manageable Spring microservices.

Understanding Monoliths and Microservices

In the vast realm of software architecture, two dominant paradigms emerge when discussing the structure and deployment of applications: monolithic and microservices. Both offer unique benefits and come with their set of challenges. Understanding the intricacies of each can help organizations make informed decisions when choosing an architectural style.

The Monolithic Architecture

A monolithic application, as the name implies, is structured as a single, indivisible unit. This design bundles the user interface, server-side application logic, and data access code into a singular application. It’s much like a well-orchestrated symphony where all components function in harmony.

Pros:

• Development Simplicity: With everything housed under one roof, setting up, developing, and testing in a monolithic environment is often more straightforward, especially for smaller applications.
• Unified Deployment: Deployment is a one-shot deal. You build, test, and deploy the application as a single unit, making the deployment process less complicated.
• Cross-cutting Concerns: Implementing cross-cutting concerns like security, logging, or caching is more straightforward since there’s a unified codebase.

Cons:

• Scalability Issues: In a monolithic setup, scaling specific components can be cumbersome. If one module requires more resources, the entire application needs to be scaled.
• Development Slowdown: As the application grows, the codebase becomes more complex, making it challenging to implement new features or make changes quickly.
• Tight Coupling: Due to the intertwined nature of components, changes in one module might inadvertently affect others, leading to potential stability issues.

The Microservices Architecture

Imagine an orchestra, but each musician is in a different room, playing their part, and yet, when their tunes combine, they produce a harmonious melody. That’s microservices for you. This architectural style breaks down the application into a collection of loosely coupled, independently deployable services. Each service is responsible for a distinct business capability and can be developed, deployed, and scaled autonomously.

Pros:

• Scalability: Each service can be scaled independently based on its demand and workload. If one service experiences high traffic, you can allocate more resources to that particular service without affecting others.
• Flexibility in Technology Choices: Each microservice can be built using the best technology for its specific needs, allowing teams to use the most appropriate tools and languages.
• Resilience: Since services are independent, a failure in one service doesn’t necessarily bring down the entire application. This decentralization enhances the overall system’s resilience.
• Rapid Iteration: Teams can develop, test, and deploy services independently, enabling faster releases and iterations.

Cons:

• Distributed System Complexity: Managing a system with multiple moving parts can be complex. Issues like service coordination, data consistency, and network latency become significant concerns.
• Data Consistency: With each service managing its database, ensuring data consistency across services becomes a challenge.
• Operational Overhead: Monitoring, logging, and troubleshooting in a distributed environment require more sophisticated tools and processes.

The Middle Ground: Modular Monolith

It’s worth noting that there’s a middle ground between these two extremes: the modular monolith. This approach structures the monolith into well-defined, internally cohesive, and loosely coupled modules. While it doesn’t offer the same level of flexibility as microservices, it can be a stepping stone, easing the transition by promoting better code organization and separation of concerns.

Analyzing Your Monolith

Before you can embark on the journey of transitioning from a monolith to microservices, it’s crucial to thoroughly understand the existing monolithic system. This understanding will serve as a blueprint for your microservices architecture and guide the decomposition process. Here’s a step-by-step approach to analyzing your monolith:

Document Existing Functionality

Start by mapping out the entire functionality of your monolithic application. This involves:

• Listing Features: Enumerate all features, both major and minor. This list will provide a high-level view of what the application does.
• User Flows: Detail how users interact with the application, noting the steps involved in each task.
• External Integrations: Identify any third-party services or systems the application interacts with, such as payment gateways, email services, or other external APIs.

Identify Core Domain Entities

Domain-driven design (DDD) principles can be invaluable at this stage. By recognizing the core entities within your application and understanding their relationships and dependencies:

• Entities: List major objects or concepts, like Users, Products, Orders, etc.
• Aggregates: Determine which entities naturally group together. For example, an Order might include OrderLines and Payments as part of an Order aggregate.
• Relationships: Understand how different entities relate to each other. For instance, an Order might be linked to a User who placed it.

Group by Bounded Contexts

Bounded Contexts, another DDD principle, refers to the boundaries within which specific terms and concepts have particular meanings. Grouping functionalities around these contexts can offer insights into potential microservices:

• Context Identification: Define boundaries where certain terms or concepts have specific meanings. For instance, in the context of customer support, a “Ticket” might have a different meaning than in the context of event management.
• Consistency Boundaries: Recognize areas where data consistency is critical, guiding you on how to split the data later.

Determine Dependencies

Understanding dependencies is vital because it will shape the communication between your future microservices:

• Internal Dependencies: Identify which parts of your application rely on others. Do certain functionalities always get invoked together?
• Data Dependencies: Understand which parts of your application share data. This will be crucial when you break apart your monolithic database.

Evaluate the Technical Debt

Every software project accumulates some technical debt over time. Before decomposing the monolith:

• Code Quality: Use tools like SonarQube or Checkmarx to analyze your codebase for potential issues, code smells, or vulnerabilities.
• Deprecated Libraries: Identify outdated libraries or frameworks that might pose challenges during decomposition.
• Hard-coded Values: Look for any hard-coded configurations or values that should be externalized or managed more dynamically.

By the end of this analysis, you should have a understanding of your monolithic application’s landscape. This knowledge will serve as the foundation upon which you’ll design your microservices architecture, ensuring a smoother transition and more effective decomposition.

Creating Spring Microservices

Spring Boot and Spring Cloud have become go-to frameworks for Java developers to create microservices. They offer a rich set of tools and libraries that simplify the development, deployment, and orchestration of microservices. Here’s a step-by-step guide on creating microservices using these frameworks:

Initializing a Spring Boot Microservice

Spring Initializr is an online tool that helps bootstrap a new Spring Boot application. To set up your microservice:

• Visit Spring Initializr.
• Select the desired Spring Boot version.
• Add necessary dependencies (Web, JPA, Cloud Config, Eureka Discovery, etc.).
• Generate and download the project.

Once set up, your basic Spring Boot application would look like:

@SpringBootApplication
public class MyMicroserviceApplication {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        SpringApplication.run(MyMicroserviceApplication.class, args);
    }
}

Data Management in Microservices

Given that each microservice should manage its data, integrating a database is crucial.

Setting Up a Database Connection

For relational databases, you can use Spring Data JPA. Update your application.properties or application.yml with your database connection details.

spring.datasource.url=jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/mydb
spring.datasource.username=root
spring.datasource.password=root
spring.jpa.hibernate.ddl-auto=update

Entity Creation

Define entities that map to your database tables:

@Entity
public class User {
    @Id
    @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
    private Long id;
    private String name;
    // ... other fields, getters, setters, and annotations
}

Inter-Service Communication

In a microservices environment, services need to communicate with each other. Spring Cloud offers several tools for this:

Service Discovery with Eureka

Service discovery allows microservices to find and communicate with each other without hard-coded URLs. By registering with a service discovery tool like Eureka, services can dynamically discover other services.

Add the Eureka dependency and annotate your main application class with @EnableEurekaClient.

Declarative REST Clients with Feign

Feign simplifies writing HTTP clients. Once you’ve defined an interface and annotated it, Feign will generate the implementation:

@FeignClient("other-microservice")
public interface OtherMicroserviceClient {
    @RequestMapping("/api/data")
    Data retrieveData();
}

Configuration Management

In a distributed system, managing configurations across services can be challenging. Spring Cloud Config provides server and client-side support to externalize configurations:

• Set up a Config Server that connects to a git repository with configuration properties.
• Microservices can then fetch their configurations from this central server during startup.

Migration Strategies

Transitioning from a monolithic architecture to a microservices-based system is a daunting task. Such a move requires careful planning, clear strategies, and gradual changes. Here’s a comprehensive guide to several tried-and-tested migration strategies:

Strangler Pattern

One of the most popular migration approaches, the Strangler Pattern, focuses on gradually replacing specific parts of the monolithic application with microservices.

How it Works:

• Identify a particular feature or module of the monolithic application that can be isolated and rewritten as a microservice.
• Develop the new microservice and divert traffic for that functionality from the monolith to this service.
• Gradually, as more features are ‘strangled’ out of the monolith, it becomes smaller and more manageable.

Benefits:

• Reduced risk as you’re only modifying a portion of the application at a time.
• It allows the team to learn and adapt as they migrate, improving processes along the way.

Incremental Refactoring

Similar to the Strangler Pattern but on a finer granularity, this method focuses on refactoring the monolith internally until modules can be split off as independent microservices.

How it Works:

• Refactor the monolithic codebase internally to isolate specific functionalities or domains.
• Once isolated, these can be broken out into separate services without major changes.

Benefits:

• Maintains system stability since most changes are internal.
• Can be combined with other strategies for a comprehensive migration plan.

Parallel Run

This strategy involves running the new microservices architecture in parallel with the existing monolith until the team is confident in the microservices’ capabilities.

How it Works:

• Set up the microservices to handle real requests but without affecting the end-users.
• Compare results from both systems to ensure consistency.
• Once satisfied, switch user traffic entirely to the microservices.

Benefits:

• Provides a safety net as the monolith remains operational.
• Offers real-world testing for the new microservices.

Database Decomposition

One of the biggest challenges in migrating to microservices is dealing with the database. Typically, monoliths have a single database that can be hard to split up.

How it Works:

• Identify clear boundaries in the database schema that align with potential microservices.
• Begin by creating separate schema views for each service, even if they still access the same physical database.
• Gradually, move each service’s data to its database.

Benefits:

• Enables data ownership by each microservice, a core principle of the microservices architecture.
• Reduces database-related bottlenecks and contention.

API Facade

An interim strategy that involves placing an API layer in front of the monolith, making it communicate as if it’s a set of microservices.

How it Works:

• Develop an API gateway or a set of facades that expose the monolith’s functionalities as independent services.
• This allows external consumers to interact with the system as if it’s already microservices-based.

Benefits:

• Provides an immediate way to expose a monolithic system in a microservices manner.
• Buys time for the internal decomposition of the monolith.

Conclusion

Decomposing a monolith into microservices is a strategic move that offers flexibility, scalability, and faster delivery. However, it’s not without challenges. By understanding your application, leveraging the Spring ecosystem, and adopting a phased migration approach, you can successfully transition from a monolithic to a microservices architecture.

1. Spring Initializr
2. Spring Cloud Documentation
3. Microservices.io — Database Patterns

Spring Boot icon by Icons8