Playing to Strangers

Why marketing to folks who haven’t heard you are most profitable

Amber Horsburgh
Feb 20 · 4 min read

I write about music strategy via my fortnightly newsletter, Deep Cuts, Subscribe. This is pt.1 in a series of marketing to casual fans, pt.2 details 13 tactics labels use to market an artist for scale. You can listen to me break this down in depth with Cherie Hu on her Water + Music podcast.

How do you build an artist’s brand? Can you do it from the bottom up amassing fan after fan until there’s a rabid enough base to breakthrough? It’s a commonly held belief that breaking songs is the result of huge vocal, dedicated fan-bases but fans aren’t actually that loyal.

To test this, I analyzed 107 artists on Spotify comparing followers to monthly listeners, using followers as a proxy for fans/heavy users. Only 24% of an artist’s total listenership is made up of fans. That’s it.

What’s perhaps even more grim is that for smaller acts (<1M followers, e.g.: Jeff Tweedy), the average is lower at 11%, whereas big acts (>1M followers, e.g.: Dua Lipa) it’s higher at 26%. This challenges the notion that building artists happens from engaging the hyper-dedicated core fan base of early adopters and instead results from increasing market share by adding more light listeners, which may not stick around for the next release.

To view the raw data, see here.

Although, not a perfect measure for loyalty followers to monthly listeners is a fine proxy. This finding is supported by marketing science of Byron Sharp, who tracked purchasing patterns of grocery products finding the bottom 80% of customers (light users) were most profitable in the next year and the top 20% aka “brand loyalists” bought less over time, becoming less valuable. Big brands have known this for years and from Facebook to Quaker Oats have altered their marketing to amass huge audiences by focusing on light users, and musicians should too.

Music listeners are rarely loyal to one act

Even the best buyers aren’t that loyal: There’s an inevitable “regression to the mean” where heavy buyers often buy less over time; light buyers buy more; and some non-buyers become buyers. So brands can’t afford to count anyone out — Byron Sharp, How Brands Grow

Spending marketing $$$ to only reach fans misses big opportunities

  1. You’ll reach your ceiling 4 times earlier than if you’d reach light listeners
  2. You’re selling to people who are already bought in

A great example of this happened just last week where my Anna of the North obsessed partner said to me “whoever’s doing Anna of the North’s paid media is on it” then went on to describe that she was following him around the Internet with ads on Instagram and Facebook.

Although he’s more than fine with her in his feeds, there’s a missed opportunity advertising to the converted — someone who’s already going to her LA show and would’ve listened to her new stuff on Friday regardless.

If you’re managing a $1MM budget to break a pop act, marketing to people that would already buy, listen and watch limits the potential audience.

To grow market share, you need to amass many light listeners who may listen only a few times

This is especially true for new release campaigns. If an artist is actively promoting a record, the share of fans drops even lower, as little as 8% for YUNGBLUD, James Blake or Sharon Van Etten all of whom released new music in the past month. On the other hand, if you’re off-cycle that number bumps up to as much as 67% for Lana Del Rey or 73% for Jack White. For YUNGBLUD, to build audience he needs to constantly add new listeners to the pipe, some which will sustain him off-cycle but rarely will they scale his new releases.

Next week I’ll follow this post with marketing strategies for light listeners and building market share. For now, subscribe to my newsletter, Deep Cuts, for more things music marketing.

Amber Horsburgh

Written by

Music marketing consultant. Downtown Records & Big Spaceship alumni. Writes about music, strategy and feels at Deep Cuts http://bit.ly/2yphFYx