Fair question!
Ester Bloom
32

Well, given the origin in a ‘tax the rich’ sense, I don’t know that I agree that it *can* mean “clueless rich person” and be generally understood. After all, it’s not possible to tax someone’s income/wealth on their degree of cluelessness.

But then, I also disagree with the construct in the ‘tax the rich’ sense, as I feel the wealth gap issue is mostly about *wealth* (as in assets), rather than income (which, yes, if high enough, almost inevitably leads to wealth), as it gives way too much of a free pass to those who ‘got theirs’ already.

But then, I qualify as “old” around the intertubez, so maybe I’m just too out of touch.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.