I gave you an actionable piece of advice, but it seems that anyone who disagrees with you must be an enemy from your viewpoint.
Here’s what you said: “Global Warming are benefits: a warmer world is a wetter one, with more rain, shrinking deserts and faster growing plants. Planet Earth benefits from the release of locked-up carbon: CO2 is hugely beneficial to plant growth — both crops and nature benefit. Future generations will honour President Trump for being the first to declare that the Climate Change Emporer has no clothes.”
First, increased temperature is not proportional to shrinking deserts. You didn’t provide any evidence to prove this claim either. Desertification has proven to be an even larger problem in the past few decades. I’m sure you google.
Second, rainfall correlates negatively with temperature, not the other way around. No evidence either. Here’s a link to an academic paper: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2012/405675/
Third, plant growth benefits from CO2. I agree with you here. Of course, too much CO2 would kill plants (they still need oxygen for cellular respiration), but that is negligible with current emissions.
I’m not responding for or against Trump. However, if you think your views are worth sharing, be willing to fact check them first.
If you haven’t noticed, this whole response is my opinion. I wouldn’t consider it particularly well-researched or fact-based, but my arguments can be grounded in well known phenomena and limited research.
Claims without evidence can be disregarded without evidence, but I used some to show you that some of the information you’ve been sharing is blatantly incorrect. And it’s not your fault. It’s the person who gave you that information. But now you are that person.
It’s common courtesy to know what you throw.
