Dude. False. 1) Even the most empirical data depends on the question being asked. There is implicit bias in all data unless it’s being delivered via cosmic download to some prophet a la the sermon on the Mount.
2) The specific statement she replied to was “Women are definitely undervaluing themselves.”
So….sure, you could INTERPRET the data to mean that or you could understand that it could reflect other SYSTEMIC TRENDS that would also ALIGN W THE COLLECTED DATA.
I know it’s fun to pretend you’re a turing complete AI and contain no intrinsic bias in your extraction, interpretation, or presentation, but….you do. And you have been called on it in a relatively respectful way….by people who have first hand lived-experience w the data.
It’s going to be ok.