(in response to yet another NYT article quoting clueless politscientists on Trump)

Baruch Kogan
Jul 21, 2017 · 2 min read

Anyway, all this is completely missing the forest for the trees.

The reality is that America’s elite has caused pre-revolutionary conditions to come into existence. How many votes Trump gets, whether he gets assassinated, impeached, jailed, etc. have no bearing on this.

According to Burnham:

“From a Machiavellian point of view, a social revolution means

a comparatively rapid shift in the composition and structure of

the elite and in the mode of its relation to the non-elite. It is pos-

sible to state the conditions under which such a rapid shift takes

place. The principal of these conditions are the following:

“1. When the institutional structure, and the elite which has the

ruling position within this structure, are unable to handle possibilities opened up by technological advances and by the growth,

for whatever reason, of new social forces.

“2. When a considerable percentage of the ruling class devotes

little attention to the business of ruling, and turns its interests to

such field; as culture, art, philosophy, and the pursuit of sensuous

pleasure.

“3. When an elite is unable or unwilling to assimilate rising new

elements from the masses or from its own lower ranks.

“4. When large sections of the elite lose confidence in themselves

and the legitimacy of their own rule; and when in both elite and

non-elite :here is a loss of faith in the political formulas and

myths that have held the social structure together.

“5. When the ruling class, or much of it, is unable or unwilling to use force in a firm and determined way, and instead tries to

rely almost exclusively on manipulation, compromise, deceit, and

fraud.

“These are the general pre-conditions of social revolution in any

culture. “

Notice how Burnham conspicuously avoids mentioning bigotry, MAGA hats and Frogtwitter (well, Frogtwitter is pretty well described in point 1) and yet manages to describe our reality EXACTLY. Without any statistical analysis or polling! Magic.

Now, please tell me, why are Ivy League professors and NYT writers not bringing this up? Why does it take my autodidact religious fanatic ass to point out that we’ve got the playbook for what’s emerging right in front of our eyes, written in concise and readable modern English? Why is it that the elite popular discourse (pretty well exemplified by your Facebook page and comments) avoids talking about the big picture and deeper issues, and speaks in shallow cliches about the most significant development in American politics since the New Deal? I’d be embarrassed, if I was a guy who got his paycheck for thinking and producing intellectual discourse, to operate on this level. But everyone thinks this is normal!

Baruch Kogan

Written by

Settler in the Shomron. Tech/manufacturing/marketing/history.

Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch
Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore
Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade