‘Climate Science’ isnt science at all. Real science has Hypothesis, Method, Data Collection by Strict Rule, Conclusions or Not. Climate Science starts with a conclusion, throws out data that don’t support the conclusion, and bassackwards creates a hypothesis and method after the fact. This of course means you will get published when you have a conclusion. The politicization of science is really a bad idea. Those that fear having their funding cut if they don’t cowtow to the so-called consensus, which is also a lie, have a legitimate concern, or must seek another line of work.