The FBI has close to two hundred iPhones it wants to get inside of, that is the real issue, and one…

You are way off topic gxorlando. The topic was the very slippery reasoning Susan used in the original article. You are speculating about all kinds of things and predicting the future. Getting back to the topic,

The Associate Press has recently published an article on this which includes this sentence, “True, the Justice Department says it wants a tool that would only work on the San Bernardino phone and that would be useless to anyone who steals it without Apples’s closely guarded digital signature.”

If that is the case, not what Susan wrote, what is your objection?

Respond to that, rather than speculate on what might happen in the future that you don’t really no anything about nor do I.

Like what you read? Give Bill Kimberlin a round of applause.

From a quick cheer to a standing ovation, clap to show how much you enjoyed this story.