Interpretation of decentralized in the popular Fomo3D game
MLM game Fomo3D
Fomo3D has attracted the attention of many users since its launch. The simple game has attracted a large number of users: if you are the last bidder and the price is maintained for 24 hours, all the Ethereum in the prize pool will be given to you. This obvious “Ponzi scheme” game became the hottest project in the Ethereum.
On July 28th Fomo3D launched a quick version. The short version has a significant difference from the previous version, and the countdown time is shorter. The short version countdown needs only 5 five minutes, while the long version countdown is up to 24 hours. So far, the game has not ended.
In the afternoon of August 8th, Fomo3D, the most attractive game in the blockchain history, entered the last 10 minutes of countdown. After 10 minutes, the last person who bought the key can take 10,430 of the 21,731 ETH prize pool, about 3.92 million US dollars.
Refuse to integrate transactions
At noon on August 5th, Weibo’s account named “BitOpia Bitcoin Utopia” released a message “P3D’s spokesperson accused F2Pool and Nanopool of deliberately delaying integrating transactions and cheating directly on the block of the Fomo3D’s quick version... " Subsequently, Weibo's account named "Blockchain Old Urchin" also released the message "According to the JUST survey, F2Poolbegan to cheat in the Fomo3D game ..."

The two bloggers pointed out that there was a scene in Fomo3D where other players’ transactions were refused, and some players only integrated their own transactions. They bluntly doubted the trust machine and referred it to a world of scammers. The reason why there are a lot of people who are willing to participate in the Fomo3D game is not only because of its simple rules of the game, but more importantly because of its security as well. In the news report on Fomo3D, it is particularly mentioned that Fomo3D is based on the Ethereum’s smart contract, and the project's own risk of cheating in blockchain has been dealt with. Yet the fact is that F2Pool cheated in the game, only integrating their own transactions.

After that, F2Pool Founder Shen Yu responded on Weibo, claiming that there was no cheating, and everything was operating normally according to factors such as handling fee, and also claiming that the news on cheating was designed by people with ulterior motives within the country.

Afterwards, things went on and gradually evolved into a big discussion about PoW and DPoS. After the frenzy of EOS, the issue of consensus mechanism was once again raised. Weibo’ celebrity Xiang Ma said that "PoW is a wicked game" and pointed out that the Ethereum PoW consensus mechanism is flawed.
What is true decentralization?
In the blockchain system, the consensus mechanism and smart contracts ensure the authenticity of the data and the contract execution, to achieve the “decentralization” of blockchain. But for now, neither PoW nor DPoS has achieved true “decentralization”.
PoW is dependent on the proportion of computing resources (CPU, and memory, etc.) in the sum of computing resources of all nodes in the world. On the surface, consensus and fairness are labor competitions. Large-scale players have enough funds and resources to unite nodes and the so-called consensus has become empty talk, and it is still the product of centralization.
Both PoS and DPoS refer to the equity proof mechanism, and DPOS is an upgraded version of PoS. The DPoS consensus mechanism also faces the problem of “pseudo-decentralization”. By voting, it gives a few people the privilege of dominance. Most people still can’t really participate, and big-capital players will still dominate the game.
But this is not to deny “decentralization”. Human progress and social development are inseparable from one word — coordination. The contradiction between distribution and centralization can be adjusted to a degree by coordination.
That is to say, the decentralization in reality can't be so absolute. It can be a highly efficient decentralized system that divides a center into multiple small centers that are recognized by all of

Therefore, the DPoW consensus mechanism came into being. DPoW (Delegated Proof of Work) uses a dual mechanism of mining and delegates to excavate Wood which is burned to vote for nodes to obtain rights to record and rewards. This approach combines the advantages of PoW (Proof of Work) and PoB (Proof of Burn), balancing decentralization and efficiency. It enables CelesOS to achieve "decentralization", "scalability" and "security" while maintaining high-performance TPS with millions per second to support enterprise distributed applications.
Regulation prevents the evil
Like Fomo3D, whether developers play tricks or big mining pools do evil is always harmful to users. We can use regulation to prevent hegemony from doing evil.
For example, the new generation blockchain operating system CelesOS integrates the latest blockchain technologies such as cross-chain technology, DPoW consensus mechanism and legal and compliance framework, aiming to increase mutual trust between organizations, reduce compliance costs and improve efficiency. According to different scenarios and settings, Public Chain, Consortium Chain and Private Chain can be developed on CelesOS.

CelesOS uses blockchain technology to establish risk prevention measures and introduces regulation to enable financial institutions to develop more innovative products on the system, bringing more convenient and low-cost financial services. Meanwhile, it is regulated and prevents the reoccurrence of financial crisis.
