What If…Global Warming Doesn’t Really Exist & I Don’t Use Science To Prove It.

I’m sitting at the dining room table reading Fast Company magazine reading an article on Elon Musk and his mission to create more sustainable housing in an attempt to protect the environment and build covert solar energy to electricity.
I admire the man’s determination for what he believes in and the innovation he strives for but I think the premise for creation is flawed — global warming.
I’ve read a lot of thoughts on either side of the argument and I’ve synthesized this simple conclusion, filled with no bs, fluff, or “this is law” philosophy.
And it alls boils down to this simple question: How can we be so sure that global warming exist in the way that is is presented to us, when the same scientists and meteorologists, who can barely predict tomorrow or next week’s weather report are the ones prophesying the data of our great demise? If someone could answer this simple yet provoking question, I would happily switch my hypothesis.
It’s been proven that many of he scientists putting together global warming reports have fudged the numbers to get their desired results. It has also been proven that the earth, however old it actually is, has gone through various cycles of both extreme hot and cold weather (anyone remember what “global warming” was called before this? It seems to switch to whatever makes sense, it’s no climate change officially.)
Again, I’m not going to use any science but simple a gut and logic. Add those things mentioned above and, you can’t honestly tell me that we know for sure global warming is 100% what the “experts,” say it is.
I’m just a no name schmuck trying to think out of the box and challenge the status quo with just a little more effort than acceptance of what “seems” a foregone conclusion.
Anyone with me?
-CE
