umair haque

« Now we need a better economics to save the world. »

Yes, and it MUST BE different. As we learned to think within other logics, we have now difficulties to get out of the « bubble ».

When we say « improving everyone’s lives » we should understand : including the Third World where people live with less than $ 100 a month.

But if they can earn only a third of what we earn in the West, we need 3 planets Earth to feed them. An environmental disaster (pollution, biodiversity, …)

Jean Tirole won the 2014 Nobel Prize in Economics. He wrote a book « Economics for the Common Goods » which is worth reading.

Also, I would remind you of the Ecological approach for Pope Francis’s « Common Home », as per the « Laudato Si » Encyclical in English : http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html

The facts remains that no World Leader is addressing the problem of human overcrowding on the planet. For any other species, we would be talking about « infestation »… How to slowly, voluntarily and democratically reduce population is something which is unlikely to happen before we get to the environmental bottom….

Jean P. Ciron

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.