I hope you’ll read this (though the presence of spam in the comments perhaps means that nobody…
Kate Brown
11

You’re not alone. I think perhaps there maybe a gene sequence for musically expressive people (“composers, musicians”) that makes them unable (or find it very difficult) to treat music as wallpaper.

I never listen to CDs or radio, and don’t own any kind of MP3 players or similar. Music to me is not and never will be a “passive experience”. I truly wish this were not the case. I sometimes find myself envious of those that “just hear” music and not concern themselves with the production, the structure(s), the cadences (was that a suspended cadence just then?) — it’s a hopeless, pointless task to even try to change it.

I have an analogy I use when I try to explain it to non-musical folks — the problem, is it sounds elitist. That is *not* how it is meant, I can assure you!

“For you, it seems to me, music is a photo — a two-dimensional representation of the composer’s/artist’s world. For me, it’s a landscape, a country, a place I can go, visit, *be*.”

I cannot be there and be here. It’s one or the other, never both at the same time.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.