The Problem with the “Blue Pumpkin”
Note from Editors: We want to clarify that this article is intended to provide information rather than to criticize the concept of the blue pumpkin. We support individuals' right to make their own decisions but also feel that being informed can assist in making better choices.
October is here and It is important to address a new idea circulating this month, which has been created with the intention of targeting individuals with disabilities.
This idea involves children diagnosed with autism, particularly those who are nonspeaking, carrying a blue pumpkin during Halloween night. The purpose of this gesture is to indicate to treat-givers that the child wants candy but is unable to verbalize the phrase "Trick or Treat."
Similar capitalist initiatives have emerged in previous years, such as bags with the words, "I can't say Trick or Treat, but I'm trying!" While these endeavors demonstrate good intentions, as someone diagnosed with High Functioning Autism (HFA), I still believe they have the potential to perpetuate discrimination. Allow me to explain why.
First and foremost, labeling disabled individuals is unjust. This should be self-evident and serves as the primary reason to oppose this practice. Some parents, upon being interviewed, have shared their perspective, stating, "I refuse to label my children simply to gain respect from strangers." Others feel they do not owe anyone an explanation to justify their participation in a shared activity. Personally, I believe this is the appropriate approach.
The use of the blue pumpkin undermines the valuable lesson that all children should be respected regardless of their abilities, instead creating an unnecessary label. Children do not need to adopt labels or wear stickers to justify their existence. They should simply be allowed to express themselves freely, whether that means being a firefighter, Batman™, or even an elephant!
Secondly, it is important to acknowledge that individuals who perpetuate the pressure for children to say "Trick or Treat" are the same ones endorsing the idea of the blue pumpkin. These are also the individuals who may not advocate for inclusive practices by contacting school boards and headmasters. Although they may or may not be aware of the blue pumpkin concept, their genuine concern remains questionable. Withholding candy as an exchange for performance represents a form of control, and no amount of "awareness" merchandise will alter their behavior. It is akin to training a puppy to perform tricks in exchange for treats.
Lastly, it is our responsibility as parents, caretakers, or guardians to protect our children from all forms of harassment and emotional abuse during Halloween, and throughout the year. Our children's emotional well-being should always be our utmost priority. We cannot assume that every person in our neighborhood is aware of the significance behind the blue pumpkin. Even those with pure intentions may not fully understand this concept, as most people lack knowledge in this area.
Instead of relying on the kindness of others, it is essential that we actively seek out inclusive events and take our children to places where we know they will be welcomed. Local zoos often organize Halloween events that are open and welcoming to children with disabilities as schools and fire departments arrange "Trunk or Treats" for their communities too.
Another option is to knock on the doors of neighbors whom we personally know and trust.
Numerous safe spaces exist, allowing us to prioritize our children's mental health without relying on strangers.
Follow The Inquisitor Magazine on Twitter
Editors: Jolie Townsend-Moyer & Ariel Prater
