Why are you so threatened by speech that you disagree with that you feel the need to censor it? You’re all fascists. You condone the acts of BLM at Dartmouth screaming at white students attempting to study in the school library all the while legitimizing the voices of black students claiming to be “uncomfortable” by the existence of a WSU. Where are the white students in the Dartmouth library’s “safe spaces”? These white student unions are a direct response to the vitriolic bile spewed by BLM activists towards white people. We have had enough. How else can you explain the popularity of Trump? You can write it off and try to silence it, but in doing so, you are only encouraging other white people to wake up and fight back. Why not try and have a dialogue with white people instead of shutting them down? BLM refuse to have a debate. They are too emotional and prone to feeling “unsafe” to be able to actually rationally debate their issues without resorting to anger. Because they aren’t capable of talking to white people, instead of talking AT us, their only recourse is to attempt to shut us down. Furthermore, the existence of a WSU is an attempt to respond to these unfair and hostile allegations of “privilege” that are leveled against us. We are entitled to have OUR voice. White student unions have as much of a right to exist as do black student unions. The hostility directed towards white people leads us to require OUR OWN “safe space”. How dare you support the attempts like the ones at the University of Missouri to hijack public space and claim it as a “safe space” while simultaneously denying white people OUR safe space in the face of an increasingly hostile climate that white people are surrounded by. I would challenge you to let this comment up and to be more willing to engage those speaking out against BLM instead of shutting down all lines of communication. You might be surprised what happens when people are willing to come to the table, without making irrational demands and just simply TALK.