Exploring the Series B Crunch

I’m curious which venture capital firms have the strongest follow-on graduation rates from Series A to B, let’s explore…

Danielle Morrill
Mar 31, 2014 · 4 min read

Tomas Tunguz of Redpoint Ventures put to paper an analysis of Series B financings, further supporting my conclusion back in October 2013 that the true winnowing of startup investment was not actually Series A after all.

The Series B is, in my opinion, the investment round which sends the strongest signal to the market that the company and its investors are aligned on swinging for the fences. Sometimes, even after a substantial Series A, there is still not true product/market fit and/or a large enough market, and this is often where M&A rather than additional funding becomes attractive. However, if a startup is viable for Series B it is likely that its initial investors will lead, or at least partake, in this financing.

Knowing this, I’ve been curious to dig into understanding two aspects attached to Series B financings:

  • For LPs — which venture capital firms currently have the most Series B stage companies, or bullets, that could potentially yield “unicorns”?
  • For Founders — which venture capital firms see the highest Series B follow-on rates for their portfolio companies?

Methodology

In this analysis, I examined firms whose portfolio companies have raised new Series B funding in the past 2 years. I also looked at the full range of Series B candidates within the portfolio (companies who have raised a Series A within the past 2 years), to understand what percentage of Series A bets have progressed to the next round.

Due to the nature of venture capital investing, it is not always possible to know who lead a financing. Instead I’ve included all investors: incubators, seed stage investors, investors who did not actually lead the Series A round, and those who did — to see whose participation is connected to the production of unicorns and follow-on investments.

I have excluded startups who have raised their Series A in the past year from the denominator, because startups generally raise new venture capital rounds every 18 months. These companies are not quite ready to graduate.


For the LPs: Stables of Unicorns

  1. Sequoia Capital (45)
  2. Intel Capital (42)
  3. SV Angel (39)
  4. Khosla Ventures (33)
  5. Accel Partners & Kleiner Perkins (31)
  6. New Enterprise Associates (30)
  7. Andreessen Horowitz (29)
  8. Bessemer Venture Partners (25)
  9. Google Ventures & Founder Collective (23)
  10. Greylock Partners & Greycroft Partners (22)

For the Founders: Conversion to Series Bs

  1. Greylock Partners & Intel Capital (88%)
  2. Kleiner Perkins (86%)
  3. Bessemer Venture Partners & Khosla Ventures (83%)
  4. Sequoia Capital (79%)
  5. Andreessen Horowitz (76%)
  6. Greycroft Partners (68%)
  7. Founder Collective (66%)
  8. SV Angel (65%)
  9. Google Ventures (64%)
  10. Accel Partners (56%)

Now, I’m sure there is some missing data here. We all know not every venture investment is publicly filed… there are plenty of reasons to submarine Form D filings, least of which is avoiding the attention of competitors, patent trolls, etc. Additionally, there are some Series B candidates we excluded, so if anything these percentage are higher than they should be. If we look outside this initial list of most active investors, we have another interesting list — by conversion rate* rather than portfolio size:

*I have excluded funds with less than 10 Series B candidates.

  1. Mohr Davidow Ventures & MPM Capital (100%)
  2. Union Square Ventures (93%)
  3. Silicon Valley Bank & Insight Venture Partners (90%)
  4. Felicis Ventures & Qualcomm Ventures (89%)
  5. Canaan Partners, Greylock Partners, Intel Capital, Tribeca Venture Partners, Atomico, Sigma Partners (88%)
  6. Shasta Ventures (87%)
  7. Kleiner Perkins (86%)
  8. Spark Capital, e.Ventures & Benchmark (85%)
  9. Norwest Venture Partners (84%)
  10. Bessemer Venture Partners, Ignition Partners, DCM, and Khosla Ventures (83%)

Curious about the entire list? Should I go further with this analysis? Let me know what you think with a quick note to @DanielleMorrill on Twitter or via email to danielle@mattermark.com

About the data: It comes from Mattermark, which leverages Crunchbase data, the AngelList API, regulatory filings, news and more to get a complete picture of the startup funding universe. Try it at www.mattermark.com

Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch
Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore
Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store