“The new world saving CPU design is no better than Intels with regards to verifiability that bad stuff does not happen” is in my opinion a strong argument. But i do not measure new CPU families to what we have now but to what we ought to have by now if we would have learnt from the past.
I find the Mill questionable. The makers of the Mill have stated again and again that they design the processor to make profit. Regarding questions of standardization or putting the ideas in to public domain they called the interview out for in their opinion wanting to steal there ideas.
Dear Nassim Nicholas Taleb,
I am a fan of your books and enjoyed reading it even though the chapter titles made only sense afterwards. Furthermore…