A response to a grumpy publisher’s accusations
Dear Tim Boucher: You did not only reject our story, you removed all previous ones from your publication as well. We are still scratching our heads as to why.
The only irony that we see here is that you accuse us of “advertising” our website — a FREE analysis and discovery tool for wholesome restaurants in the US, that also raises awareness about modern nutrition issues and dangers— yet you invite us to advertise with you at rates that you will only discuss in private. We are not sure who is trying to make a dime here, and not in a very transparent way…
Eatosophy is a collaborative effort. We are a team of people that are passionate for clean food, and we choose to disclose what we consider important. Just because you put a name out does not make you more transparent, and that certainly does not apply to your publication’s guidelines, objectives, and “advertising rates”. You might be better off focusing on the opinions expressed in and the scientific knowledge that is freely shared through our articles, rather than nitpicking on our profile and wording, digging up details and connecting them in a way that makes us look dishonest to cover your true motives.
Best of luck and have an “organic” day yourself!