This story is unavailable.

You don’t get to say that I’m the one providing statements without backing and then not provide any valid arguments why. That’s not how debates work. I laid out some arguments as evidence that are disprovable, now you get to disprove them with your evidence. It’s fine if you don’t try to disprove them, but you don’t get to claim that you’re right without doing so.

“I don’t have the time or the interest to pursue a discussion with a person who claims to be in search of truth while regurgitating alternative facts on which to base flawed arguments.” Yes, I think we can agree on this point. This will be my last response to you, Factless Rod.

To your last point, I could care less about Hillary. I wrote to defend the “Clintonites” of which the original author demonizes and scapegoats for problems that aren’t really their fault.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.