I want to explain something very basic to you.
You are not a liberal. You are a marxist.
The entire basis of your position, as seen in your first three sections, is that there exists inequality in the world, and we should apply force to fix it. You want to use…
Absolutely. Acting to impede a person from leaving a scene is a hostile act, and when it takes place in an environment where a reasonable threat of violence is present, it justifies use of force in self-defense.
In other words, if people want to unass from a scene, get the fuck out of their way.
“In fact, this “small government” ideology is a lingering by-product of the racist counter-ideology expressed by conservatives in the 1960s in response to civil rights”
I think you need to do some research about the votes in the House and Senate and what parties cast which votes.
To be frank, if the federal government didn’t decide to take on the mandate of the plights you name here, I think we would see a much more educated public, because people would take more responsibility for the circumstances that exist in their own lives, instead of “relying” on the fed government.
You make some valid points, and I agree with most of what you wrote, but little things kept distracting me, such as blatantly slanted language and wrong word usage.
For instance, instead of “enter the race,” you write “get in on the action,” which has connotations of something dodgy and possibly illegal.