An incredibly inelegant response.

You simply ignore the good point made by your commenter and state “no” like a petulant child. The fact that it gets so many likes is disheartening, but it’s pretty typical.

He states that a male hiring may use personal experience to choose his male or female hires, and this is not sexism.

He is right. When I have hired in my role, I use my experience of other humans to judge individuals of both genders.

An interview IS a process of judgement. Choosing one person over another.

Not everyone can be a winner, and it is perfectly permissible to choose someone with lesser qualifications whom you feel is a better complete person for the role. Relationships are a great way to learn traits and how to spot them, whether they’re romantic or friendships.

Erratic behavior is a good reason not to hire somebody regardless of qualification, and the person hiring has the right to use his judgement when hiring for a private business.

You evidently resent your “bro boss”. I wonder if that has more to do with this than any concern for gender equality?

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.