TršŸ©ll Smear #4: ā€œBernie was not an effective legislator and he never accomplished anything in Congress.ā€

EuroYankee
Aug 22, 2017 Ā· 3 min read

In fact, nothing could be further from the truth. As explained in this article in AlterNet, and even confirmed here in PolitFact, Bernie was known as the ā€œAmendment Kingā€ in Congress.

People who do not understand how Congress works may tend to downplay the importance of Amendments. This is wrong. Just ask any abortion rights activist what they think about The Hyde Amendment.

Moreover, what the AlterNet article makes clear is that Sanders managed to pass very progressive Amendments that helped working families and the poor, and he did so in a Republican controlled Congress.

This last fact is also important, because one of the biggest attack lines against Bernie is that he cannot work ā€œacross the aisleā€ to garner GOP support for his issues. As both the AlterNet and PolitiFact articles point out, Bernie was extremely effective at rallying bipartisan support for progressive legislation.

Sanders did something particularly original, which was that he passed amendments that were exclusively progressive, advancing goals such as reducing poverty and helping the environment, and he was able to get bipartisan coalitions of Republicans who wanted to shrink government or hold it accountable and progressives who wanted to use it to empower Americans.

So where does this ā€œholier-than-thouā€ smear come from? Well, let’s take a closer look at Barney Frank, the powerful Chair of the House Banking Committee, who was instrumental in designing the Dodd-Frank financial regulations bill that bears his name. He is also one of the most vocal proponents of the ā€œBernie was isolated and ineffectiveā€ smear campaign.

Here is a 2012 quote from Barney Frank that you will NOT find in an article in which he attacks Bernie for insisting on so-called ā€œpurityā€:

ā€œPeople say, ā€˜Oh, it doesn’t have any effect on me,ā€™ā€ [Frank] says. ā€œWell if that were the case, we’d be the only human beings in the history of the world who on a regular basis took significant amounts of money from perfect strangers and made sure that it had no effect on our behavior.ā€ — Barney Frank to NPR

Immediately upon retirement from Congress, Barney Frank was given a cushy job on the Board of Directors of a $24 billion Wall Street Bank. This seems strange, when we are always told how strict and ā€œtoughā€ Dodd-Frank supposedly was on the banks, and what a great piece of ā€œprogressiveā€ legislation it was.

In reality, Dodd-Frank was a watered-down bill that did nothing to reduce the size of the banks or keep them from posing a renewed danger to the world economy. Passing such faux-reforms is what gets a Congressman a seat on a Board of Directors once they leave what they cynically refer to as ā€œpublic service.ā€

Suffice it to say, when people like Barney Frank criticise Bernie Sanders for being ā€œholier-than-thouā€ about money in politics, there is a very good reason for them to do so.

Addendum: Here is a great article by the great RJ Eskow (courtesy of Jack Albrecht) that refutes Barney Frank directly:

)

EuroYankee

Written by

The EuroYankee is a US Ex-Pat with dual US-EU citizenship, who travels Europe extensively, commenting on trends, attitudes, politics and more.

Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch
Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore
Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade