That’s his point.
Adam Wykes
1

No, I’m not missing it. I’ve been pointing it out in every reply I’ve made to him (and to you, though apparently that just came across as an insult).

Let me make it perfectly clear: I am not a rapist nor will I ever be, because of empathy. Empathy has nothing to do with getting caught or the reprisals of aunts/grandmothers. In this context empathy is the ability to see what rape would be like for the person raped.

Which leads to the point: Daniel Johnson does not rape, because he might get caught and that would be bad for him. I do not rape because it would be bad for the person raped.

Do you see the difference? Or am I just being condescending again?

Like what you read? Give Peter Lind a round of applause.

From a quick cheer to a standing ovation, clap to show how much you enjoyed this story.