1.2K Followers
·
Follow

Museum Logos: Drawing The Line

About a month ago, the Metropolitan Museum of Art changed their logo. You might have seen it:

Image for post
Image for post
It’s red

The change got me thinking about Museum logos more generally, and I started spending more time analysing them. (Because that’s just how fun I am). While looking over a few visual identities, I stumbled across a trend. A harrowing commonality that suggests some international conspiracy between our cultural gatekeepers. I am equal parts scared and excited to present my findings to you today.

Let’s start with one of the all-time great Museum logos: The Victoria and Albert Museum.

Image for post
Image for post
Don’t make the same mistake as me and pronounce it ‘vanda’

What are we looking at here? Sure, it’s the name of the museum, but what’s important is that it’s an abbreviation where the two letters get smushed together along a diagonal line. It’s a simple way of depicting the different disciplines of the Museum, while simultaneously symbolising the influence of both Victoria *and* Albert.

I thought I’d noticed this quirk somewhere else, and then I recognised it in the logo of my own workplace, the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences:

Image for post
Image for post
The ampersand is to stop it being MAAAS

The two As here are once again cut in half across a diagonal line. “So far, big whoop.” I hear you cry.

I checked my findings by looking at another big Museum in Sydney, The Australian Museum, and I was shocked.

Image for post
Image for post
It’s red.

They’ve taken letter smushing to a new level. Not only are the A and M connected, but they’re the same shape. If you had orange-red colour blindness (which I don’t think is a thing but whatever) you wouldn’t even be able to tell them apart.

I looked elsewhere in Australia, to Museum Victoria:

Image for post
Image for post
It’s green.

Not only do the diagonal lines touch, but they’re overlapping! And if you look closely (which clearly I have), there are even diagonal lines in the background!

At this point I started to panic. I needed more data. Maybe this was just an Australian thing. Let’s pick a country at random. Poland? You got it. Here’s the National Museum of Warsaw:

Image for post
Image for post

At this point there aren’t even distinct letters. The lines have taken over completely. The company that did the design work for them even started plotting what would happen if the logo went on forever:

Image for post
Image for post

Where can we find some salvation? Surely America, land of the free, has not yet succumbed to the tyranny of diagonal li-

Image for post
Image for post

No! National WWII Museum! Is there anyone who can put up a resistance?

Image for post
Image for post

WHITNEY! At first glance it looks like they too have fallen; trapped with a W in their name. But if you look closely, the Whitney’s full name is the Whitney Museum of American Art. They’re conducting a valuable piece of subterfuge to avoid a much longer diagonal line for the full WMAA.

Which brings us back to the Met. Their full name is ‘the Metropolitan Museum of Art’, but they go by ‘the Met’ these days. (You can’t expect a museum to use the name ‘MMA’, lest a legion of Mixed Martial Arts fans attend en masse, disappointed and angry that they can’t watch the legendary Mauricio “Shogun” Rua break someone’s spine.) So maybe they’ve pulled a Whitney and fought back against the diagonal lines? Well. Look at the Met’s logo. Now back to me. Now back at their logo, now back to me. What do you see? They’ve fallen prey to the smushed-letter conspiracy too.

And what for the future? The ‘intersecting diagonal line’ continues to develop into 3D form for the Armenian American Museum:

Image for post
Image for post

Meanwhile in Asia, the lines are taking some unsettling new forms. The Mori Arts Center has dispensed with the points altogether:

Image for post
Image for post

And the Asia — Europe Museum Network looks like its trying to cover up their diagonal lines with a subtle 90° tilt:

Image for post
Image for post

Someone more naïve than me would say this conspiracy (and yes, it’s a conspiracy) of smushy-letter-diagonal-lines is merely the product of design firms finding it hard to capture the multi-faceted work of what a museum does. But I say no! There is clearly a powerful shadowy network behind all this.

What sort of Museum organisations could be responsible for such a thing? The American Alliance of Museums?

Image for post
Image for post

Seemingly benign events like Museum Week?

Image for post
Image for post

No. This can only come from the international organisation with the most important diagonal-line logo of all:

Image for post
Image for post
(File photo)

But not all is lost. We can still fight back. Today, brothers and sisters, I would like to propose a new international coalition to keep these logos in check: the Worldwide Art Museum Name And Visual Identity Nomenclature Merging Awareness Association, or WAMNAVINMAA. I’ve already taken the liberty of drafting our logo:

Image for post
Image for post

Oh, and be prepared, Science Centers. I’ve already started researching your logos, and I’ll be uncovering the conspiracy there as well, just as soon as I can figure out what they all have in common.

Image for post
Image for post

Written by

Performer-y thing, language type, museum-ite. General Manager at Jetpack Theatre, Asst Curator at ACMI. He/Him. The museum logos article was a fluke sorry xoxo

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store