Michael Flynn on Edward Snowden

  • I may miss something and it was indeed possible that Snowden got his hands on critical information from the Department of Defense. Flynn was right.
  • The DIA messed up and thought that they had proof, but then discovered it was not so, or it was not that stringent or pervasive. It was then hard to admit the mistake. But according to the DIA, a big team was on the case since July 2013. Would they have done that if the initial information was lukewarm? Maybe if Michael Flynn or someone else high up wanted it so. But then I would expect a strong rebuke for Michael Flynn, not his dismissal.
  • Michael Flynn did not have the information he claimed to have. Still that would also imply that others followed his lead, talking points and report to congressional committees were fudged. That is hard to believe. However, if it was so, that would be a very good reason to can Flynn ASAP. Although the official story is one of resignation, the early news reports and the odd departure date seem like some settlement was negotiated. But that must have been pretty fast.




Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium


Being Held Hostage In The United States Of America

If Republicans Don’t Stand Up To Trump, They Must Cease to Exist


Ring Out the Cold, Ring in the New

How to Say What You Want in the Age of Political Correctness

This Week’s Quiz

Dumping Humpty Dumpty

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Freisinnige Zeitung

Freisinnige Zeitung

More from Medium

Why should you pay attention to Koii?

Writing a Story, What Pictures Tell Us and What They Leave Out

OMAR NASER: The New Spirit of Tradition

An Open Farewell Letter