Bertrand Russell’s seminal essay ‘In Praise of Idleness’ is more relevant now than ever

Che Fisher
Sep 19 · 3 min read

In Prase of Idleness is a classic essay made all the more relevant by the rise of automation and technological unemployment, you can read it for free right here (approx 25–30 min read time), and it’s absolutely worth the half hour or more it might take you to get through it.

Although first published in 1932 the message is more relevant now than ever, especially considering the jobs we are, or are very nearly, automating away (which, in this developer’s humble opinion, we absolutely should — why force humans to complete tasks that a machine can do more effectively?).

The issue of automation and technological unemployment is admittedly a contentious one, but when (brace yourself, incoming name drop!) Andrew McAfee thinks there is cause for concern I would rate his opinion as a damn site more reliable than that of the Steve Mnuchin’s. What’s more, Andrew is not alone in holding that opinion: Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, and Bill Gates have all weighed in on the issue of technological unemployment as a result of automation.

The problem, therein, is not with automation per se, but with our attitude towards work, an attitude Russell was right to cast doubt on partly in response to the industrial revolution.

This problematic attitude is essentially that we think of work as “good”, as a morally good thing worth pursuing, and it is perhaps best captured in the infamous pin analogy contained in the below excerpt from the essay:

Suppose that, at a given moment, a certain number of people are engaged in the manufacture of pins. They make as many pins as the world needs, working (say) eight hours a day. Someone makes an invention by which the same number of men can make twice as many pins: pins are already so cheap that hardly any more will be bought at a lower price. In a sensible world, everybody concerned in the manufacturing of pins would take to working four hours instead of eight, and everything else would go on as before. But in the actual world this would be thought demoralizing. The men still work eight hours, there are too many pins, some employers go bankrupt, and half the men previously concerned in making pins are thrown out of work. There is, in the end, just as much leisure as on the other plan, but half the men are totally idle while half are still overworked. In this way, it is insured that the unavoidable leisure shall cause misery all round instead of being a universal source of happiness. Can anything more insane be imagined?

This is perhaps why some people find the idea of Universal Basic Income (or UBI) so offensive: it goes against our moral notions of work and especially the idea that people “shouldn’t expect something for nothing”, or that “doll bludgers” (an Australian slang term for someone recieving social welfare) are somehow a threat to the very fabric that holds society together.

So what does this have to do with the gifted, intelligent, and well payed tech/product/IT/business innovators of the world?

Quite a lot, really. We not only have a responsibility to write ethical (and readable!) code, to raise objections if/when our company/superiors ask us to build things which we believe will be used to harm others, and hold ourselves, our products, and our businesses accountable for the ways in which they can be used and abused (see: Cambridge Analytica), we also have a responsibility to enact positive, social change and especially in those areas we are affecting.

If we are the innovators driving technological change and helping to automate away certain jobs, it’s a bit on the nose if we then turn around and say to those low-skilled workers that were stacking shelves, driving trucks, or even building homes, that they are lazy and should get a job, that they ought to be working (see what I did there? Normative statements are just one way we express value judgements).

After all, is not laziness a governing principle of every good programmer?

If you’d like to read more about the morality of work (or New Work Philosophy) or if you like the following quote from Aristotle: “We work to have leisure, on which happiness depends”, here’s a LinkedIn post from yours truly that dives a little deeper.

Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch
Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore
Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade