Jul 20, 2017 · 1 min read
To Michael Bryant: http://blog.hotwhopper.com/2013/12/list-of-scientists-respected-in-their.html . This is one of the responses to the article you seem to love. “Peer review” requires “peers”, and if you judge a room full of morons by the company they keep, then you are playing fast and loose with the intended meaning of “peer review.” Please understand that the world you find so alienating has no conspiratorial intent to rob you of whatever you do for a living and whatever you choose to do in your free time. In fact, the world only pays attention to you when one of your own gets into the white house.
