Worst of Both Worlds

Brandon M. Sergent
Jul 30, 2017 · 3 min read

So first she wished death on an enemy and more or less got it, and now she’s playing the gender card.

/sigh

The real collaboration here is between the worst of both worlds. Now we have tactics reminiscent of third wave “feminism’s” worst, in the same body as authoritarian right wing kill whomever I dislike ideology.

(Sidenote: Wishing death on McCain is morally identical to when Clinton wished someone would drone bomb Julian Assange.)

I should do a study on how the 1% corrupted and marginalized her. Or I should say how their machines did it on auto pilot, since I doubt any active intervention was required.

What’s really interesting is that she seemingly doesn’t link the two. The left’s attack on her is an immune response caused expressly by her right wing vitriol. Whether or not that reaction is rational or justified isn’t the point. It exists in the first place because her growing hate, and disregard for human rights, set off the right wing nut job detectors in the left’s social media immune system, dysfunctional though it may be.

To fix this she needs to homogenize her ethical systems such that no part conflicts with any other part. This is actually easy to do. Simply divorce the people from the ideology and focus your attacks exclusively on that which causes suffering and death.

Her justification for McCain death wishing was he caused death and pain, and she’s right, but as I explained before wishes can be perfect. Our words and deeds grow from the soil of our philosophy and her’s literally has a small place that welcomes brain cancer and that is clearly the core problem.

There is minimal difference ethically between running with the desire to see someone die and making it happen. This is why paying someone to kill and killing are similar crimes. It’s double ironic since her hate for McCain is just primarily for just this sort of detached murder when he’s presumably physically guilty of killing with his own hands having been a solider.

So that means she agrees with me that running with a desire to see someone die is morally equivalent to murder enough in her mind to justify the exact same kind of detached murder. X)

I do not assert her hypocrisy in some kind of tu quoque I’m right because she’s wrong. My goal here is to point out that her ethics are cannibalistic and that is the root of her friction with elements of the progressive left (and some of those merely think they are.)

Total fakers however are excused because they would look for ways to attack her anyway and make them up if needed, however, this ethical inconsistency provides then with a ready made tool to pry open a hole in the armor. This sadly will likely lead to more anger on her part which will inspire bigger inconsistencies and an even better tool for the next cycle.

Cait, please, oppose your own desire to wish death on people and do not use cursed weapons like the gender card. It’s like a sword that doesn’t even have a handle. Winging it might do more damage to your foes, but it’s shredding your hands.

And please, don’t wish death on anyone. Wish for something better.

Brandon M. Sergent

Written by

Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch
Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore
Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade