This article is shedding light in the right direction.
Timothy Busbice

Good long post, thanks.

Many DL researchers, similar to ML but to a less extent, have a comfort zone in mathematics. That is true. There is even the demand by the more traditional ML folks (i.e. Vapnik) that there is not enough mathematics ( meaning, not enough theory). I prefer to look at DL as being experimental and I seek out the few experimental results that our out there to refine my intuition of how I think DL works.

I’m of course not about the criticize the high priests here about their comfort blanket. There is of course a human reason for the attachment, that I’m not about to discuss in public.

Best of luck on your research!

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.