Wildfires + Bus Lanes

Isaac Wang
Oct 24 · 3 min read

I live in a district that is prone to wildfires.

I cannot rewind time and tell people, “We shouldn’t build in hazardous environments prone to wildfires.” It’s done.

Moving forward, we shouldn’t build in places that catch on fire, but what should we do now?

The typical answers you might hear for addressing wildfires are:

  1. Fireproof your house.
  2. Buy insurance. If you can’t buy fire insurance → state insurance reform.
  3. Make electric utilities companies pay for damage.

I think these are all valid. But as a person with an urban planning background, I’m primarily concerned about the physical setup of our suburban neighborhoods and the lack of egress: How do we escape?

Suburbs have a curvilinear road structure, rather than a grid. ← (Click).

You can also read about “Street Hierarchy”. Grids are very efficient and can move traffic in many directions. Curvilinear roads are highly inefficient, because cars have to follow non-cardinal routes to get from Point A to Point B, and there’s only one way to get there. Imagine if Pac-Man was a rigged game with curvy routes, where you couldn’t escape.

There’s also the flip side of this problem: How do we get firetrucks into areas on fire? This becomes a real problem when they have to get to their time-sensitive destinations, but have to sit in traffic with all the other cars.

If you were to look at the distribution of fire stations in San Diego, you’d find that denser areas have more fire stations, and low density suburban areas have fewer fire stations. This is a bad math problem: lots of area to cover, fewer fire stations. Building more fire stations and throwing more money at it is only part of the solution.

My solution is to take our current roads and re-draw some lines. From the left side of the street to the right side (known as right-of way), cities can do what they want. We can make travel lanes for cars, bike lanes, railroad tracks, gravel footpaths, etc. We can make our car lanes 15 feet wide or 10 feet wide. People who work in transportation can re-think how streets are drawn.

I’m advocating that we take our right-of-way in arterial and collector roads, make some roads skinner (15 ft → 10 ft), and use the extra space to create something similar to a bus-only lane. We don’t have to build any new roads.

Rendering from City of Chicago

In these new lanes, we offer fire-trucks and emergency first responders priority access. No cars are allowed to travel on them. This allows fire trucks to get to destinations rapidly. During normal times, these are bus-only lanes. This allows our mass transit in suburbs to gain a speed advantage and not have to sit in traffic.

In short, we’re not taking away any lanes, we’re just making them skinnier. We’re taking the extra space saved and devoting its use to fire-trucks, police vehicles, ambulances, and buses. Everybody wins.

— —

Paid for by Isaac Wang for City Council 2020 FPPC ID# 1416799

Candidate for San Diego City Council D5: Visit www.isaac.vote // Paid for by Isaac Wang for City Council 2020 FPPC ID# 1416799

Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch
Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore
Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade