The New York Times In Lockstep With The Washington Compost

It’s just a revolving door of leaks. This is a coup in the making.

The coup is here. It is being perpetuated by the mainstream media who are working hand-in-hand with the democrats and those within the Trump administration to overthrow him. Never Mind the blatant lack of evidence, their goal is a psyop to destroy Trump’s supporter base. They want to crush his momentum. They want his supporters to doubt him while emboldening the Democrat base for 2018.

The Washington Compost just released this: “The senior White House adviser under scrutiny by investigators is someone close to the president, according to these people, who would not further identify the official.

Check out the quote from this article that you had to scroll down a bit for. You know, past the point anyone will actually read:

People familiar with the investigation said the intensifying effort does not mean criminal charges are near, or that any such charges will result.

We first have to look at what does scrutiny mean? Someone is being looked into. Does that mean anything? No, not really. It could be they just want more information from someone. We have no way of knowing because there is NO INFORMATION even provided. Expect more of this to come as the media just wants Trump gone and they will do whatever it takes.

Now, there is some speculation it is Jared Kushner. Personally, I would love to see him get the boot. Jared’s had some odd financial ties to Russia so I’m not really surprised. But again, does this mean anything? Not really.

Now onto the New York Times Story. They are claiming that Trump said this in a document summarizing the meeting he had in the Oval Office.

“I just fired the head of the F.B.I. He was crazy, a real nut job,” Mr. Trump said, according to the document, which was read to The New York Times by an American official. “I faced great pressure because of Russia. That’s taken off.”

Note the part that I bolded. First off, their source read the document to a New York Times “journalist?” Anything like how they were “read” the memo from James Comey? So, they have NO IDEA what’s actually in the document. But, let’s say it is real. Who was talking to The New York Times? The only people who should realistically have access to this document would be someone within the NSC. Maybe Dina Powell?

Trump has got a leaky ship and he is his own worst enemy. He is openly allowing these things to happen at this point. His refusal to clean house will be his downfall if things doing get in order soon. The media doesn’t care, they do what they do for clicks and ad revenue. Sure, they are pushing an agenda, but their ratings are skyrocketing and subscriptions are at an all time high.

Then we have another report about: Israeli Intelligence Furious Over Trump’s Loose Lips. All I am going to do is link this article which completely refutes this:

Brig. Gen. (ret.) Amnon Sofrin, who headed the Mossad’s intelligence directorate explained that the unwritten rules governing the disclosure of intelligence information are different for foreign intelligence agencies than they are for foreign leaders. Foreign leaders have “the ability and the mandate to make use of information according to their considerations,” Sofrin said. Still, he should “ask his people about the sensitivity of this information.”

At this point, I can’t fault the media for doing what they do. They will continue to do this and continue to attack Trump. Trump needs to clean house and get the leaks in order. Judging by the credibility of outlets like the Washington Compost, I find it hard to trust any of their sources. But even if it is true, it shows those within his administration are openly trying to overthrow him. The scary part will be when the intelligence community starts fabricating evidence out of nowhere linking him back to Putin and the DNC attack.

PS: Did you already forget Anthony Weiner pleated guilty to sexting with a minor today? These stories drop when this happens and when Trump is leaving. I’d like to say it more or less had to do with Trump leaving but you can never be too sure in this day and age.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.