WriteHuman Review: Is This AI Humanizer Worth the Investment?

AI-generated content seems to be prevalent in various forms, such as articles and YouTube comments. It can be challenging to determine the extent of AI-generated content and whether you are reading original content or AI-created material.

WriteHuman claims to transform AI-generated text into writing that is indistinguishable from human writing. However, can it truly bypass AI detectors and fulfill its promises? Let’s investigate.

Humanize AI Text With AIHumanizer

Embark on a journey to refine your AI texts and make them undetectable by detectors, utilizing the innovative capabilities of AIHumanizer.

What Is WriteHuman? A Comprehensive Overview

WriteHuman is an AI paraphrasing tool designed to mimic human writing in AI-generated content. It boasts compatibility with different AI content creators and claims it can evade detection by AI checkers such as Turnitin and ZeroGPT by pinpointing and circumventing telltale AI indicators in the text.

WriteHuman Features

While WriteHuman may appear as a simple three-step tool, it certainly possesses notable features.

Ease of Use

The tool’s simplicity is a valuable feature. WriteHuman follows a straightforward three-step process: copy your AI-generated text, paste it into their platform, and click a button to make it undetectable. It is convenient regardless of your level of technical expertise.

Privacy Protection

The platform places a strong emphasis on safeguarding online privacy, asserting its ability to eliminate AI tracking that could potentially expose your usage of AI tools or your data. This is particularly crucial for professional content creators who wish to keep their key ideas classified.

AI Detection Countermeasure

WriteHuman invests time in understanding popular AI detection platforms such as Turnitin, ZeroGPT, and other well-known AI detectors. As a result, it knows what triggers these tools and strives to avoid them, making your content appear more human-written.

Pricing

WriteHuman offers a straightforward tiered pricing structure to accommodate different budgets and monthly usage scenarios. The Basic plan costs $8 per month and allows for 600 words per request, with a limit of 40 requests per month. If you require more, the Pro plan offers 1,200 words per request and 100 requests per month for $14.

The Ultra plan, priced at $32 per month, offers 3,000 words per request and unlimited requests for those desiring more flexibility. Though the pricing is fair, it might seem expensive to some due to the lower word limit per tier.

The Potential of WriteHuman Tool

You must be curious to see if WriteHuman can truly make AI-generated text undetectable. To demonstrate its capabilities in a real-world scenario, we will generate a brief article about the transition from ICEs to EVs using ChatGPT as the test content.

We then input the generated text into WriteHuman, and here is the outcome.

Next, we will evaluate the “humanized” text processed by WriteHuman using some AI detection tools, including Originality.ai, GPTZero, Content at Scale, ZeroGPT, and Writer.com.

WriteHuman vs Originality.ai

Originality.ai’s newest Turbo 3.0 detection model shows that it is 99% certain that the input text, humanized by WriteHuman, is generated by AI. The majority of the content is highlighted in red, indicating that most of the processed text remains AI-generated. This shows that WriteHuman has not managed to evade Originality.ai’s detection.

WriteHuman vs GPTZero

We then tested the same content using GPTZero, and the results showed a 96% likelihood that the content was generated by AI. All of the provided content is marked in yellow, indicating that the style of the processed text strongly resembles that typically produced by AI.

WriteHuman vs Content at Scale

The results from Content at Scale do not inspire confidence either. A few sentences are marked in orange, indicating that Content at Scale was unable to determine whether the content was written by AI or a human. The rest of the content is mostly marked in red, suggesting that it is likely generated by AI.

WriteHuman vs ZeroGPT

We are now testing the content with ZeroGPT. The AI detector shows an 81.32% likelihood of AI/GPT-generated content. All of the content is marked in yellow, indicating a high probability of AI involvement in the writing of the provided content.

WriteHuman vs Writer.com

Frankly, Writer is one of the simplest AI detectors to bypass, based on our experience. In this case, the outcome produced by WriteHuman still struggles to gain approval from the detection tool. Writer suggests an 88% certainty that the content is AI-generated, indicating that further manual revisions are necessary to reduce the AI-generated appearance of the text

Superior WriteHuman Alternatives to Outsmart AI Detectors

Although WriteHuman is user-friendly and displays some potential, its ability to pass as a human is not quite there yet. Additionally, the strict word limit per request (and generally inflexible monthly limits) could be a dealbreaker for some users. So, you may be wondering if there are better WriteHuman alternatives available.

As an alternative, AIHumanizer offers superior results and ease of use without such restrictions. It provides more generous word counts and does not require any payment to fully utilize the platform.

AIHumanizer utilizes specially developed text humanization technology to manage texts generated by AI models, enabling it to evade AI detectors such as GPTZero and Originality.ai. Moreover, it maintains the inherent meaning of the text. The goal is to achieve a perfect undetectable score of 100%.

AIHumanizer offers a higher level of flexibility compared to various equivalent tools, providing a choice of 3 bypass modes for tailing content and AI detection bypass requirements. It can manage a diverse array of content such as high school essays, Ph.D. research, news articles, creative stories, and marketing text, enabling individuals from various industries to effortlessly bypass AI detection.

Evaluating AIHumanizer’s Performance

Despite the above claims, it is important to see how AIHumanizer actually performs in real-world scenarios. We will test AIHumanizer using the same ICEs and EVs transition article. Here are the results:

It should be noted that AIHumanizer includes an integrated AI detection checker, eliminating the need to leave their site to check the AI/Human score of your content. To demonstrate the accuracy of this checker, we will still test the processed content on dedicated AI detection platforms.

AIHumanizer vs. Originality.ai

Firstly, the result from Originality.ai is a promising start for AIHumanizer. The content is all marked as green, and their latest Turbo 3.0 model suggests that the processed content is likely to be written by a human. Originality.ai appears to be 98% confident in its assessment.

AIHumanizer vs. GPTZero

Next, we have the result from GPTZero. The processed content from AIHumanizer achieves an impressive 0% probability of AI involvement. GPTZero believes that the content was likely written by a real person with a 92% certainty, although a small portion of the text is identified as a mix of AI and human.

AIHumanizer vs. Content at Scale

Then it’s the all-green outcome from Content at Scale. Nearly all of the text is highlighted in green, indicating that AIHumanizer is capable of generating content that can successfully pass the AI detector.

The only lengthy sentence highlighted in orange is the one at the end of the fourth paragraph, indicating that the AI detector struggles to determine whether it was written by a human or an AI. The sentence is factually accurate and well-structured, characteristics that can be found in both AI and human writing.

AIHumanizer vs ZeroGPT

The AI detection result from ZeroGPT also brings good news. None of the text is highlighted in yellow, and ZeroGPT considers the content to be likely written by a human. The humanized content produced by AIHumanizer can easily bypass ZeroGPT without any issues.

AIHumanizer vs Writer.com

The final AI content detector is from Writer. This platform does not highlight any text; it simply indicates whether the content is AI or human-generated. Regardless, the humanized content from AIHumanizer can successfully bypass the Writer AI detection, so there is no need to worry about your content being mislabeled as AI-generated.

Final Thoughts — Is It Worth Trying?

Overall, WriteHuman has the potential to emerge as the top choice, but its results are not quite there yet. Our test reveals that the content produced by WriteHuman failed to bypass all 5 AI detectors, which means you will need to make additional edits to the WriteHuman output if you want to outsmart all those AI content detectors out there.

Fortunately for you, there are other options available to address this issue. For instance, you can consider using AIHumanizer, which offers reliable bypassing capabilities and exceptional content excellence. Therefore, if you require a discreet AI rewriter at present, it would be advisable to explore these alternative solutions.