Jul 27, 2017 · 1 min read
In my seeking to understand, yet with limited bandwidth to research every detail, I read an article such as this and I can’t help but wonder, “how do you arrive at Donald Trump being the antidote?”
I don’t know enough about the specifics of this topic, but I don’t find it challenging to believe that there are continuous funny games (clearly unethical and likely often illegal) within both political parties as we struggle with the fabric of our democracy. But even if I take all of what I just read at face value as factual, I don’t understand the leap to Donald Trump. How can the lens be applied to one side and not the other? In as much as I don’t want that leap to impact my interpretation of the article, I can’t help it.
