I’ve always heard “literary” (which I call the “L” word) used to distinguish certain books from…
Sam Gridley

Yes, I’ve heard that usage as well. I still think it’s unnecessarily exclusionary. Like a book with mainstream success can’t be literary. I just hate the not-so-subtle implication of quality in that categorization.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.