The next paragraph is very unclear. Is the author talking about real CP or not? This is a recurrent issue with this document, and induces much confusion. Everything that follows is along the same line. Comparing CP to videogames is a strange choice, valid if representation, but not if real. This would be more related to “snuff-film”.
“Peer-review” of the work of a Pterodactyl.
Roran_Stehl
13
This issue is seen in many of her personal tweets on the subject as well, though examples actually given by her have indicated more that she’s talking about actual CP, and not shotacon/lolicon/other fictional representations, rather than those that involve harm to actual children.