What you shame as “hate” & “harassment” is accurately called “Free Speech” These people are in America. You appear to have forgotten that. Instead of shaming companies, Stop shaming the corporate entities. They’re not to blame. They’re irrelevant. If you insist on whining (every bit as ugly and unproductive), shame the immature people who so acted. The companies would be at greater risk if they didn’t allow it. Why? Free Speech. It’s still on paper as a fundamental right in America. Even if the Constitution thereof is all but worthless today. I digress.
In essence therefore you are complaining about two things: 1) immature and disgraceful conduct that is completely lawful whether you like it or not, & 2) Life in America. As to the first, I addressed that in paragraph #1. As for the second, grow up, or get the #@$% out of this country until you can appreciate exactly what it is you are whining about like a mewling baby.
And every single one of those people you are ridiculing have a point. Maybe they could have made it in a different or more tasteful fashion, but I would even hazard that a lot more of them are more “right” than you, or the beautiful Emily Ratajkowski (who I’d be delighted to join for dinner if you’re ever travelling in my part of the world).
And Unfortunately, I agree with her critics, but not because she has some nice tits. I haven’t seen them. I’m tempted to google them and find out what all the fuss is about, but it’s irrelevant to her political thoughts. The fact is that if she wants to support Bernie, I’ll vehemently disagree with her. But I’d still fight and kill anyone who tried to deny her that right, just like many of our uniformed servicemen still would, despite how the Armed Forces have been being neutered in this country. And afterward I’d try to talk some sense in her. Personally, I hate to think of what the country will look like — or how much whining there will be — if Bernie were to win. Socialism never works. It never has, it never will, with the human race as it exists now, or for the past 1,000’s of years. It’s contrary our nature, drive, ambition, and motivation, all of which it stifles, without exception. You can’t take one’s earnings by force (IRS is a government entity of forceful coercion) and give them to another without backlash, in several forms.
I haven’t seen a single Bernie supporter yet, with the possible exception of Bill Maher, that appreciates this fundamental fact. And he is not representative of the American people at large. He has the money to give, and he has the desire to give. If a majority of Americans had at least the desire, and some money to give, VOLUNTARILY, the utopic ideals Bernie is pitching would be achievable. They will never last via an act of government. Socialist ideas acted on from a personal motivation are generally called philanthropy. Socialism does not work. Philanthropy does.
I don’t think Bernie can win in a face off against Trump. So it might be a moot point. But if he is able to prevail and win the seat he covets…
Watch and you’ll see.