I think you guys are wrongly interpreting the hook point of these attacks. It’s not the fact that she’s a woman supporting Sanders, it’s the fact that she’s a model sticking her nose in politics and thinking that the fact that she’s talking at a rally is of any importance. To be honest, I can’t think of any reason why I’d be interested in hearing what she has to say, whether it was Sanders or Clinton or Rubio or anybody. No woman (and no human) should be harassed online (or otherwise) but this time it was just too easy: it’s not the woman part, it’s the model part. But this whole article just keeps stressing the woman part. Politics is a complicated thing. I mostly don’t understand it. I’m a common person. I’d like to hear a woman talk at a rally that has something interesting to say coming from experience. I would have thought the same if a male model went up there to speak. Really, enough with the gender discrimination discussion.