Coming to a Roadway Near You:
HL Sensory Overload
51

I’ll be eagerly awaiting part two, but I think part 1 makes a great case for exactly why I support both connected vehicle technology and self-driving cars. I have a problem understanding why the article describes this another “over-regulated fishbowl.” Is the implication that the system is currently unregulated? The only additional regulation cited in the article will be the requirement for legacy vehicles to install a ‘transponder.’ So? I think the article downplays the significance of a generational transition to self-driving cars. It isn’t just better fuel efficiency, faster commutes, and reduced pollution — which are all great. It’s not even the $120b in lost revenue. A nation of self-driving cars also includes about 10k fewer deaths due to intoxicated drivers.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.