This story is unavailable.

The NYT’s defense (ie “that millions agree with him”) is indefensible.

However, two positive things that can be said:

  1. Though a staunch conservative, Brett Stephens is capable of rational argument, hence potentially persuadable.
  2. Readers who leave comments in response to NYT’s conservative columnists are unmerciful and often educate the public better than the columnist.
One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.