Do Alternative Treatments for Cancer Work? This Study Says No

By Amanda Livingston

Treatments for cancer — including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery and hormone therapy — all have serious side effects, so some people opt to try alternative therapies that claim to fight cancer. But do these alternative therapies really work?

In short: No. They don’t.

Dr. Skyler Johnson, a physician at the Radiation Oncology department at Yale-New Haven Hospital in Connecticut and lead author of a study published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, found data on 281 people with breast, prostate, lung and colorectal cancer who used alternative treatments for their conditions.

Ultimately, his research proved that people who chose alternative medicines, or AM, were 2.5 times more at risk of dying than the 560 people in the dataset who chose conventional cancer treatments, or CCT.

According to Dr. Johnson’s study, “Although rare, AM utilization for curable cancer without any CCT is associated with greater risk of death.” His research found that people with breast cancer who chose solely AM versus CCT were more than 5 times likelier to die. People with colorectal cancer were more than 4 times likelier to die.

Dr. Johnson told Healthline that the study will help doctors relay concrete information to people considering alternative medicine. He said the study was needed “for us to be able to have informed discussions with patients. To tell them this is the risk and benefit from this decision.”

)
MedShadow Foundation

Balancing Drug Risks & Benefits

Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch
Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore
Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade