Predictive Programming is a phenomenon that unfolds across various media forms. Elites manipulate humanity through audio and visual content, using repetition of falsehoods and lies to condition the masses into accepting certain information. The more we are exposed to specific information, the more we gradually accept it due to the familiarity it creates. Predictive programming involves portraying certain themes through media, which targets our subconscious, subtly affecting our future choices and beliefs without our awareness. Initially, it may seem like one of those “conspiracy theories” that appear absurd.
“Predictive Programming is the theory that the government or other higher-ups use fictional movies or books as mass mind control tools to make the population more accepting of planned future events. This was first described and proposed by researcher Alan Watt who defined Predictive programming as a subtle form of psychological conditioning provided by the media to acquaint the public with planned societal changes to be implemented by our leaders. If and when these changes are put through, the public will already be familiarized with them and will accept them as natural progressions, thus lessening possible public resistance and commotion.” (Wood) The concept was later popularized by Alex Jones and David Icke.”
“At its core, Predictive programming is a tactic to reduce resistance by introducing concepts that seem far-fetched and continuously reintroducing them to make these concepts appear more likely or at the very least acceptable. Movies and television are commonly used for this purpose. When watching something, a person perceives it as entertainment, and their theoretical guard is lowered, allowing subliminal messages to reach the subconscious directly. This also serves as a sort of self-fulfilling prophecy because once an expectation is created, the population may seem more likely to accept the fate when these events start to happen.” — https://u.osu.edu/vanzandt/2018/04/18/predictive-programming/
Fictional dramas may depict random events so that when they occur in real life, we associate the event with fiction. The mere-exposure effect gets activated, and we accept it as it is because it’s familiar to us.
Why do you think every American action movie is about a government plot, a government conspiracy, or a secret (evil) elite? They want us to think that these scenarios can’t happen in real life, that these things only occur in fiction. Although such themes fascinate humanity, it’s unclear whether someone made these concepts into a “fictional action” movie out of imagination, or deliberately for a specific purpose to affect viewers with hidden messages, forever unknown unless one is conscious of it.
Edvard Bernays’ success is largely due to Freud’s psychology and realizations about the human subconscious, which have proven to be true, thus giving them and others with such information an upper hand in using it to control the populace. The events I’m discussing in this document have already been secretly shown to us through movies and TV shows. This has been happening for at least 50 years, as evidenced by clear examples of predictive programming prior to 9/11 in both cartoons and movies.
How is it possible that a supposed hidden organization controls or pulls strings in all mainstream media, in movies, cartoons, and comics? Perhaps it’s through bureaucratic rules and regulations, money and bribery, or compliant workers who do not question authority — an authority which, unknown to them, is not what they think.
Newer series like Black Mirror, owned by Netflix, show future dystopian events and systems.
“Well before the coronavirus outbreak, the British anthology series Black Mirror was taking realistic events and characters and twisting them into a recognizable-but-disturbing world. With the pandemic, though, show creator Charlie Brooker says he’s not working on new episodes, because… “well, just look around.” “At the moment, I don’t know what stomach there would be for stories about societies falling apart, so I’m not working away on one of those,” — https://www.cnet.com/news/black-mirror-creator-charlie-booker-not-working-on-black-mirror-because-life-is-black-mirror/
This suggests that many episodes, which revolve around horrific concepts, could come to life as the technology used is already here. One scenario is the dehumanization/perceptual change in people who get a chip implanted in them (possibly connected to the American “Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies”). Another is the ranking system with mobile devices, or the “innocent killings” through a mobile game-app, which merges horribly with real drones in real life, unbeknownst to the users.
Aldous Huxley, who wrote the fictional book “Brave New World,” was a thinker of the 19th century. He initially wrote the book as fiction but later saw the impending realities society was heading towards. The author, who wrote the book before World War II, supposedly changed his mind after witnessing the authoritarian, power-hungry events that surfaced during that time. In a 1958 interview, Huxley said:
“I do think there are a number of impersonal forces pushing in the direction of less and less freedom, and I also think there are a number of technological devices which anybody who wishes to use can use to accelerate this process of growing away from freedom and imposing control.”
“Well, another force which I think is very strongly operative in this country is the force which is called over-organization. As technology becomes more and more complicated, it becomes necessary to have more and more elaborate organization, more hierarchical organization. And incidentally, the advance of technology has been accompanied by an advance in the science of organization. It is now possible to make organizations on a larger scale than was ever possible before. So you have more and more people living their lives out as subordinates in these hierarchical systems, controlled by bureaucracies, either bureaucracies of big business or the bureaucracies of big government.”
“What I feel very strongly is that we must not be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology. This has happened again and again in history when technology has advanced, and their businesses change in social condition. And suddenly, people find themselves in a situation which they didn’t foresee, doing all sorts of things they didn’t really want to do.”
“He was asked, ‘What do you mean? Do you mean that we develop our television, but we don’t know how to use it correctly? Is that the point you are making?’”
“Well, present television is being used quite harmlessly, but I would feel it’s being used too much to distract everybody all the time.”
“Mr. Huxley. In your new essays, you state that these various enemies of freedom are pushing us towards a real-life brave new world, and it’s awaiting us just around the corner. First of all, can you detail for us what life in this brave new world, which you fear so much, might be like?”
“I think this kind of dictatorship of the future will be very unlike the dictatorships which we are familiar with in the immediate past. Take another book ‘Prophesying the future,’ which is very remarkable, George Orwell’s 1984. This book was written at the height of the Stalinist regime and just after the Hitler regime. There he foresaw the dictatorship using entirely the methods of terror and physical violence. I think what is going to happen in the future is that the dictators will find that as the saying goes, ‘you can do everything except sit on them.’ If you want to preserve your power indefinitely, you have to get the consent of the ruled. And this they will do partly by drugs as I foresaw in Brave New World and partly by the new techniques of propaganda. They will do it by bypassing the rational side of man and appealing to his subconscious, his deeper emotions, his physiology, and so making him actually love his slavery. I mean, this is the danger, that people may be in some ways happy under the new regime.”
“Why do you consistently attack the advertising agency?”
“The danger in a democracy is this. I mean, what does a democracy depend on? A democracy depends on the individual voter making an intelligent and rational choice of what he regards as enlightened self-interest. But what these people are doing, and the dictatorial propagandists are doing, is to try to bypass the rational side of man and to appeal directly to his unconscious forces below. You are in a way making nonsense of the whole democratic procedure, which is based on conscious and rational ground.”
“Why is it that the wrong people will use these various devices and for the wrong motives?”
“Well, I think one of the reasons is that these are all instruments for obtaining power, and obviously the passion for power is one of the most moving passions that exists in man. And all democracy is based on the proposition that power is very dangerous and is extremely important not to let any man or a small group have too much power for too long a time. And all these new devices are extremely efficient instruments for being in a position of power by small groups or larger methods.”
Huxley was onto something here, and we see that what he writes becomes increasingly relevant. Though he was born into a wealthy globalist family with connections to Charles Darwin, who invented the theory of evolution, I would not be surprised if Aldous knew or was told how it all would unfold all along.
Another person was George Orwell, a writer who lived from 1903 to 1950. He wrote his novel called Nineteen Eighty-Four — 1984. It is about a tyrannical authoritarian regime.
“Nineteen Eighty-Four: A Novel, often published as 1984, is a dystopian social science fiction novel by English novelist George Orwell. It was published on 8 June 1949 by Secker & Warburg as Orwell’s ninth and final book completed in his lifetime. Thematically, Nineteen Eighty-Four centers on the consequences of totalitarianism, mass surveillance, and repressive regimentation of persons and behaviors within society.” — Wikipedia
“In the dystopian novel ‘Nineteen Eighty-Four’ (1949) by George Orwell, the Thought Police (Thinkpol) are the secret police of the superstate Oceania. They discover and punish thoughtcrime, personal and political thoughts unapproved by the government. The Thinkpol use criminal psychology and omnipresent surveillance via informers, telescreens, cameras, and microphones to monitor the citizens of Oceania and arrest all those who challenge the status quo authority of the Party and the regime of Big Brother. Orwell’s concept of ‘policing thought’ derived from the intellectual self-honesty shown by a person’s ‘power of facing unpleasant facts’” — Wikipedia.
There is something reminiscent of this ‘thought police’ in what is now called ‘fact checkers’ on social media. If you deviate from their guidelines, you face permanent banning from the service. Posting ‘false information,’ or information they deem untrue, leads to being blocked, your channel deleted. They exclude you. Numerous historical events are not as clear-cut as they would have us believe, yet their opinion is the only one considered ‘fact.’
Totalitarianism is not the government dictating what people should think; it’s presenting biased choices to the public, nudging them towards a preferred outcome and creating the illusion of decision-making. Throughout the history of authoritarianism, tyrannical regulations and limitations were often accepted because people believed they were for their safety, a recurring theme in authoritarian regimes.
Now, it’s not just corrupt governments but also organizations and corporations colluding together. Mainstream media (MSM), social media, and internet algorithms nudge us towards bias. YouTube and Twitter manipulate likes, dislikes, and view counts. This has been demonstrated multiple times, with users suddenly subscribed to channels they didn’t select or YouTube shadowbanning videos because of the opinions presented. It’s a direct threat to true democracy.
A tyrannical government begins the moment it tries to control the information you receive, by limiting it. This always results in psychological deception, forcing you to believe one point of view while demonizing the other, the same for corporations with similar intentions.
If censorship continues on these private platforms, known as social media, it will eventually lead to large-scale mass deception. The platforms themselves become biased and not objective. Is this due to their good intentions?
They dictate adherence to guidelines, what you can and cannot say, who and what you cannot criticize. Social media and YouTube end up placing people in echo chambers, leading to extremism.
This trend escalated in 2020 and will result in global deception towards the end times, with polarized opinions on political issues worsening.
“All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed, they must rely exclusively on force.” ~ “Free speech is my right to say what you don’t want to hear.” ~ George Orwell
But now, your beliefs are chosen for you, and if you don’t seek alternative information, you will fall. Always remember to consider every aspect and perspective. Blindly accepting one viewpoint renders you ignorant of the complete picture, a perspective that is not solely from your viewpoint.
“The further a society drifts from truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.” ~ “The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history.” ~ George Orwell
“In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” ~ George Orwell
I cannot say for certain if writers like Orwell or Huxley used predictive programming to write about societies they somehow knew would emerge. Perhaps they were simply talented writers who, inspired by their time’s situation in Europe, had a deep understanding of human psychology. After all, books have been stated as the Illuminati’s primary method of subversion. (More on that later).
“In the year 1984, the government of Oceania, dominated by the Inner Party, uses the Newspeak language to control the speech, actions, and thoughts of the population, defining ‘unapproved thoughts’ as thoughtcrime. For such actions, the Thinkpol arrest Winston Smith, the story’s protagonist, and Julia, his girlfriend, as enemies of the state. In conversation with Winston, O’Brien, a member of the Inner Party and a Thinkpol officer, reveals that the Thinkpol conduct false flag operations, such as pretending to be members of the Brotherhood to identify ideologically disloyal Party members. As an agent provocateur, O’Brien gives Winston a copy of the forbidden book, ‘The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism,’ by Emmanuel Goldstein, the enemy of the state of Oceania. Yet, the existence of The Brotherhood in Oceania remains uncertain, as O’Brien refuses to confirm or deny its existence. Telescreens in the quarters of every Inner-party and Outer-party citizen allow the Thinkpol to audio-visually police behavior for unorthodox opinions and spy on visible indications of mental stress manifested by a person struggling with ownlife, such as words spoken while asleep. The Thinkpol also spy upon and eliminate intelligent people, such as the lexicographer Syme, who is rendered an unperson despite his fierce loyalty to the Party and Big Brother.”
The book ‘1984’ depicts an extreme tyrannical government that primarily uses force for power. However, physical force isn’t necessarily the main factor of a future tyrannical government. It can also be achieved through mere exclusion. For exclusion to be sustained, force is needed. As any society gravitates towards extremes and opposes the natural nature of humans, force becomes the inevitable outcome to sustain such a corrupt government. This serves as a warning about the abuse of power and the problem of elites controlling the largest corporations. It foretells a possible future where technology is used to enslave people.
Tyrants use force, whether violence or psychological, to achieve their goals and remain in power. The advertising industry, media, and politicians actively use psychology knowledge to sell more or instill certain beliefs or psychological reactions in you that support their goals. This may not necessarily be evil, but if used for deceptive purposes, the scale of evil becomes apparent.
