I think that’s unfair. I’ve been pleasantly surprised with Tjarks’ work and think he is doing a great job filling the enormous shoes left by Zach Lowe’s departure.
I think the bigger issue is, as others have pointed out, the shorter articles. Tjarks makes a lot of good points but doesn’t totally elucidate on all of them. I suspect that’s more a limitation imposed by the website rather than by a deficiency on Tjark’s part.
Not that I wouldn’t love to have Lowe back. But give Tjarks his credit.